Karen L. King (2) (1954–)
Autor(a) de Reading Judas: The Gospel of Judas and the Shaping of Christianity
Para outros autores com o nome Karen L. King, veja a página de desambiguação.
About the Author
Karen L. King is the Winn Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Harvard University in the Divinity School.
Obras de Karen L. King
Images of the Feminine in Gnosticism (Studies in Antiquity & Christianity) (1988) — Editor — 31 cópias, 1 resenha
Revelation of the Unknowable God: With Text, Translation, and Notes to Nhc Xi, 3 Allogenes (California Classical… (1995) 12 cópias
The Jesus summit the historical Jesus & contemporary faith [video recording] (1994) — Moderator — 1 exemplar(es)
Associated Works
The Complete Gospels : Annotated Scholars Version (Revised & expanded) (1992) — Contribuinte — 691 cópias, 5 resenhas
The Nag Hammadi Library in English, Fourth Revised Edition (1996) — Contribuinte — 566 cópias, 3 resenhas
Paths to the power of myth : Joseph Campbell and the study of religion (1990) — Contribuinte — 30 cópias
Gnosticism, Platonism and the Late Ancient World: Essays in Honour of John D. Turner (Nag Hammadi and Manichaean… (2013) — Contribuinte — 11 cópias
Heresy & Identity in Late Antiquity (Texts & Studies in Ancient Judaism) (2008) — Contribuinte — 9 cópias
Mystery and Secrecy in the Nag Hammadi Collection and Other Ancient Literature. Ideas and Practices (2011) — Contribuinte — 5 cópias
For the Children, Perfect Instruction: Studies in Honor of Hans-Martin Schenke on the Occasion of the Berliner… (2002) — Editor, algumas edições — 3 cópias
Etiquetado
Conhecimento Comum
- Nome de batismo
- King, Karen Leigh
- Data de nascimento
- 1954
- Sexo
- female
- Locais de residência
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Educação
- Brown University (PhD|History of Religions)
University of Montana (BA|Religious Studies) - Ocupação
- professor (Ecclesiastical History) (Harvard Divinity School)
- Organizações
- Harvard University (Hollis Professor of Divinity)
American Academy of Religion
Society of Biblical Literature
International Association for Coptic Studies
Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas
Membros
Discussions
NYT: A Faded Piece of Papyrus Refers to Jesus’ Wife em Let's Talk Religion (Junho 2016)
Resenhas
Listas
Nonfiction (1)
Prêmios
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Estatísticas
- Obras
- 9
- Also by
- 9
- Membros
- 1,509
- Popularidade
- #17,039
- Avaliação
- 3.9
- Resenhas
- 22
- ISBNs
- 41
- Idiomas
- 4
- Favorito
- 1
What's really excellent, though, is the second portion of the book, consisting of King's translation of Judas accompanied by a fairly comprehensive end-note commentary on the text by King (substantially longer than the scriptural text itself), and here I'd give it at least 4½**** or even 5*****
Judas would have been written in the mid-second century. It couldn't have been later because it is one of the heterodox scriptures condemned by St Irenaeus of Lyon in Against Heresies {Wikipedia}, which itself was written around 180CE, Irenaeus dying a martyr just about the turn of the century; and it definitely postdates the canonical gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John) because it was written in response to and criticism of these canonical gospels.
There seems to be some expectation that Judas could be an antidote to the sometime anti-Semitism of the canonical gospels (especially John), but that's not the case. In fact, there's no reference in Judas to a Roman execution of Jesus – the Jewish leadership alone is implicated. Judas also might prove offensive to current-day readers for its snide references to homosexuality.
The significance of Judas is that it condemns orthodoxy's glorification of martyrdom, equating this to "blood sacrifice"; rejects atonement theology (Jesus died for the sins of the world), seeing this as a hideous "child sacrifice" theology; and denies a physical, bodily resurrection of the dead. Instead, resurrection is a spiritual resurrection (which isn't necessarily entirely contrary to the resurrection theology of the genuine Pauline letters) – but this isn't docetism {Wikipedia}, which denies the humanity of Jesus or of the suffering of his human body.
It would be too lengthy and complicated a discussion to completely summarize King's treatment of Judas. Suffice it to say that this heterodox scripture treats the "traitor" apostle as the only one who really "got it right" – he "betrays" Jesus at Jesus's own direction in order that Jesus can fulfill his destiny of dying to give an example of exactly how a spiritual resurrection will occur. Those who truly understand this message and live a life consistent with it will themselves be spiritually resurrected while the rest of humanity will simply die (i.e., no eternal lake of hellish fire, or whatever).
Judas, though, seems not to reject martyrdom entirely. Yes, die if need be as a result of your spreading the message of Jesus (Judas himself is finally stoned by the other apostles); but don't expect it to be an "express ticket" to heaven or to any bodily resurrection, don't claim that "the blood of martyrs is the seed of the church," and reject atonement theology.… (mais)