An amazing look at the problem of evil within the wider Christian context and the only one I’ve found somewhat satisfying. I liked its focus on Southeast Asia as well as its response to Catholic and Calvinist hyperbole. ( )

Here is a book I will need to reread a few times to take in what I've missed or misunderstood the first time around. At barely 100 pages, I looked up more words than I have with any other book. The lexicon at work here is so perfectly specific, but it bogs down what is already a difficult topic - not just in logic but in fundamental beliefs.

I found many profound and succinct ways of articulating what I believe in this book, while also stumbling through some hand-wavery to explain the crux of the issue - why on God's green earth is evil present.
I submit wholeheartedly to the idea that God is all loving and good and evil cannot come from him or be part of his "plan". To believe in a god like that would be shrugging off accountability, essentially leaving one complicit in the evil. A very Nuremberg defense of bad theology.
I just find myself wanting more explanation of why creation fell in the first place, allowing the mysterious hand of evil to bind us to death. Free and rational beings apparently call for it, but I lost the plot with that explanation. We might be free of a controlling will, but we are certainly not individually free of creation's falling.
I think this is leading me to a more communal understanding of the Church and the body of faith, and away from the personal/individual religion I grew up with. The deconstruction continues. ( )

My one criticism of this work is that perhaps it is too densely packed. In fact, it may take multiple readings to understand, yet I believe it is worth the effort. ( )

Hart is an Eastern Orthodox Christian and writes from a perspective that is a little different than what we usually hear. The book is rich is philosophy, theology, and literary references, and will sometimes take a second or third reading of a passage to understand. Hart interacts extensively with the writings of Voltaire and Dostoyevsky in building his theodicy.

Although Hart states that he is not trying to make Reformed theology "the bad guy", he freely admits that certain elements of Reformed theology are simply not compatible with Eastern Orthodox theology. As an Arminian, I found it refreshing to find a work that is so rich and deep.

Since it seems that tragedies come at a fairly regular pace, this is a highly recommended work in understanding God and suffering. As noted, some passages take effort - but you will be rewarded richly for the effort. ( )

Excellent and very readable meditation on the problem of evil as it came to the fore after the tsunami on December 26, 2004 that killed at least 100,000 in Southeast Asia. Uses literary sources in his meditations, especially Voltaire's poem after the Lisbon earthquake, and Doestoevsky's Brothers Karamazov. Takes some strong shots at Calvinist predestinarian understandings of divine providence