Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros
|
Carregando... The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values (original: 2010; edição: 2010)de Sam Harris
Informações da ObraThe Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values de Sam Harris (2010)
  
Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.   ) ropable | Aug 20, 2023 |  The book is a long long long sequence of "it can be done: you'll see". Not much else in there... (  ) kenshin79 | Jul 25, 2023 | ) kevinkevbo | Jul 14, 2023 | This book argues for a science-based approach to determining morality. It is an interesting argument, clearly well thought out, strong and enticing, but I still have reservations. While, as Harris argues, a science of morality may be possible, human beings do things that are totally irrational, often very impulsive and frequently even in violation of their own best interests. Harris realizes this, but I believe that there are practical models for morality that can be more fully and regularly applied by people in their normal decision making. Using Harris' technique, consider this: Captain Kirk (Star Trek) makes a decision. Mr. Spock gives him one of the "Spook is puzzled looks" and says, "Is that logical, Captain?" A science of morality is Dr. Spock, Captain Kirk is the rest of us. Still, I like the thinking and arguments. It was a pleasure to get back to reading Harris after such a long time since my last visit to his work. Still, however, for a clear presentation on human morality, I recommend the incomparable six stages of morality developed by Lawrence Kohlberg as well as the clear reasoning and concrete examples of Jacob Bronowski. Kohlberg's book is difficult to obtain and expensive, but a search of him and a glance at the Wikipedia article will give people the idea of the power of his work. Bronowski's book, The Ascent of Man" became a PBS series a few years ago. (  ) PaulLoesch | Apr 2, 2022 | ) SeekingApatheia | Apr 13, 2021 |
 The Moral Landscape is a well-written and thoughtful exercise in secular moral realism, but it attempts to do something far more ambitious—it purports to give us the basis for a science of morality. While the subtitle of Harris' book insists otherwise, science cannot determine human values—it can do no more than tell us how to best implement the values we already have.  In sum, Harris's fight against relativism, his desire to inform morality with the sciences, and his quest to bring philosophical and scientific topics to those outside the academic world are all praiseworthy goals and should be mimicked by Christian thinkers. However, Harris's tendancy [sic.] to write as if there are simply no other arguments around besides his own, certainly no rival ethical (much less scientific) theories, is nothing less than astonishing. It relieves him of any epistemic obligation to answer serious objections to his ethical theory.  In the end, it’s odd that one can share so many of Harris’s views and yet find his project largely unsuccessful. I certainly share his vision of the well-being of conscious creatures as a sensible end for ethics. And I agree that science can and should help us to attain this end. And I certainly agree that religion has no monopoly on morals. The problem—and it’s one that Harris never faces up to—is that one can agree with all these things and yet not think that morality should be “considered an undeveloped branch of science.” Yet such science is best appreciated with a sense of what we can and cannot expect from it, and a real contribution to the old project of a “naturalized ethics” would have required a fuller engagement with its contradictions and complications. Instead, the landscape that the book calls to mind is that of a city a few days after a snowstorm. A marvelously clear avenue stretches before us, but the looming banks to either side betray how much has been unceremoniously swept aside. Tem um comentário sobre o textoDistinctions
Sam Harris dismantles the most common justification for religious faith--that a moral system cannot be based on science. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
 Google Books — Carregando...GênerosClassificação decimal de Dewey (CDD)171.2Philosophy and Psychology Ethics Theories of Ethics Intuition - Moral sentimentClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia: (3.76)
É você?Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1