Página inicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquise No Site
Este site usa cookies para fornecer nossos serviços, melhorar o desempenho, para análises e (se não estiver conectado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing, você reconhece que leu e entendeu nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade . Seu uso do site e dos serviços está sujeito a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados do Google Livros

Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros


The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values (2010)

de Sam Harris

MembrosResenhasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
1,7034110,483 (3.76)13
Sam Harris dismantles the most common justification for religious faith--that a moral system cannot be based on science.
  1. 00
    Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love de Helen Fisher (tyomero)
    tyomero: Anyone unfamiliar with recent research on neurobiology can find many interesting facts, most of the time counterintuitive.
  2. 00
    World Peace Diet: Eating for Spiritual Health and Social Harmony de Will Tuttle (kimberlysteele)
    kimberlysteele: Despite its title, The World Peace Diet is not a diet book. Instead, it is a philosophical collection of observations about the ethics of eating animals and how this practice came into being. That's why it belongs with other discussions of ethics.… (mais)

Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Veja também 13 menções

Mostrando 1-5 de 41 (seguinte | mostrar todas)
I'm struggling to overcome the overt racism of an author who seemingly gets his information on Islam from Fox news. The book reads like an attempt to vilify Muslims and polarize religions. While Christianity doesn't get out scot-free, it escapes the false claims and sweeping generalizations made about their Abrahamic brethren, Muslims. The author seems to have little worldly experience and little capability to consider ideas from any perspective other than his own. Given this, it's an effort to put stock into his arguments and hear out his ideas. ( )
  LaPhenix | Jul 8, 2024 |
Okay, I'm convinced. The basis of morality should probably be based on the spectrum of effect that our actions have on the well-being of other conscious beings. We don't rely on centuries-old folklore to define our medical treatments; why rely on the same for our moral values? Some actions create greater happiness and well-being than others, and the extent to which actions lead to happiness is something that psychology and neuroscience can help measure and evaluate. The basis of a well-considered and defensible system of moral behaviour may therefore be validly based upon science, as opposed to faith in some imaginary creator. I may need to read this again, but I feel like I've got an ample amount of philosophy to chew on for the moment. Recommended. ( )
  ropable | Aug 20, 2023 |
I agree in principle - but that's it: a principle.
The book is a long long long sequence of "it can be done: you'll see". Not much else in there... ( )
  kenshin79 | Jul 25, 2023 |
On the plus side this book was very thought provoking. On the negative side it read more like a work of philosophy than science. Not what I was expecting or hoping for. ( )
  kevinkevbo | Jul 14, 2023 |
Reading Sam Harris is an intellectual treat, a feast for the brain cells, an oasis amidst today's current 'sea of twaddle'. His arguments sizzle and his support for them is full, complete and unemotional. He is the absolute best author to return to after reading a bunch of escapist things, even good escapism so that the intellect can be re-calibrated, often with the bar raised from its previous place.
This book argues for a science-based approach to determining morality. It is an interesting argument, clearly well thought out, strong and enticing, but I still have reservations.
While, as Harris argues, a science of morality may be possible, human beings do things that are totally irrational, often very impulsive and frequently even in violation of their own best interests. Harris realizes this, but I believe that there are practical models for morality that can be more fully and regularly applied by people in their normal decision making.
Using Harris' technique, consider this: Captain Kirk (Star Trek) makes a decision. Mr. Spock gives him one of the "Spook is puzzled looks" and says, "Is that logical, Captain?" A science of morality is Dr. Spock, Captain Kirk is the rest of us.
Still, I like the thinking and arguments. It was a pleasure to get back to reading Harris after such a long time since my last visit to his work.
Still, however, for a clear presentation on human morality, I recommend the incomparable six stages of morality developed by Lawrence Kohlberg as well as the clear reasoning and concrete examples of Jacob Bronowski. Kohlberg's book is difficult to obtain and expensive, but a search of him and a glance at the Wikipedia article will give people the idea of the power of his work. Bronowski's book, The Ascent of Man" became a PBS series a few years ago.
( )
  PaulLoesch | Apr 2, 2022 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 41 (seguinte | mostrar todas)
The Moral Landscape is a well-written and thoughtful exercise in secular moral realism, but it attempts to do something far more ambitious—it purports to give us the basis for a science of morality. While the subtitle of Harris' book insists otherwise, science cannot determine human values—it can do no more than tell us how to best implement the values we already have.
adicionado por rybie2 | editarNew Rambler, Bryan Druzin (Mar 28, 2016)
In sum, Harris's fight against relativism, his desire to inform morality with the sciences, and his quest to bring philosophical and scientific topics to those outside the academic world are all praiseworthy goals and should be mimicked by Christian thinkers. However, Harris's tendancy [sic.] to write as if there are simply no other arguments around besides his own, certainly no rival ethical (much less scientific) theories, is nothing less than astonishing. It relieves him of any epistemic obligation to answer serious objections to his ethical theory.
adicionado por Christa_Josh | editarWestminster Theological Journal, Patrick Arnold (Sep 1, 2011)
In the end, it’s odd that one can share so many of Harris’s views and yet find his project largely unsuccessful. I certainly share his vision of the well-being of conscious creatures as a sensible end for ethics. And I agree that science can and should help us to attain this end. And I certainly agree that religion has no monopoly on morals. The problem—and it’s one that Harris never faces up to—is that one can agree with all these things and yet not think that morality should be “considered an undeveloped branch of science.”
adicionado por danielx | editarNew York Review of Books, Allen Orr (May 12, 2011)
Yet such science is best appreciated with a sense of what we can and cannot expect from it, and a real contribution to the old project of a “naturalized ethics” would have required a fuller engagement with its contradictions and complications. Instead, the landscape that the book calls to mind is that of a city a few days after a snowstorm. A marvelously clear avenue stretches before us, but the looming banks to either side betray how much has been unceremoniously swept aside.

Tem um comentário sobre o texto

Você deve entrar para editar os dados de Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Compartilhado.
Título canônico
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Data da publicação original
Lugares importantes
Eventos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
For Emma
Primeiras palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
The people of Albania have a venerable tradition of vendetta called Kanun: if a man commits a murder, his victim's family can kill any one of his male relatives in reprisal.
Últimas palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
(Clique para mostrar. Atenção: Pode conter revelações sobre o enredo.)
Aviso de desambiguação
Editores da Publicação
Autores Resenhistas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Idioma original
CDD/MDS canônico
LCC Canônico
Sam Harris dismantles the most common justification for religious faith--that a moral system cannot be based on science.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo em haiku

Current Discussions


Capas populares

Links rápidos


Média: (3.76)
0.5 1
1 9
1.5 1
2 27
3 60
3.5 10
4 114
4.5 14
5 71

É você?

Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing.


Sobre | Contato | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blog | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Históricas | Os primeiros revisores | Conhecimento Comum | 208,809,807 livros! | Barra superior: Sempre visível