Página inicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquise No Site
Este site usa cookies para fornecer nossos serviços, melhorar o desempenho, para análises e (se não estiver conectado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing, você reconhece que leu e entendeu nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade . Seu uso do site e dos serviços está sujeito a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados do Google Livros

Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros

Carregando...

Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande (1937)

de E. E. Evans-Pritchard

MembrosResenhasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
387465,595 (3.46)10
This acknowledged masterpiece has been abridged to make it more accessible to students. In her introduction, Eva Gillies presents the case for the relevance of the book to modern anthropologists.
Adicionado recentemente porbiblioteca privada, Chancegar, CUA-ANTHRO, StevenEsp, KamalaniJohnson, Gipeto88
Bibliotecas HistóricasGillian Rose
Nenhum(a)
Carregando...

Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Veja também 10 menções

Exibindo 4 de 4
Unfortunately this was an abridged version and I would love to know what was left out as I always find the anecdotal stories as interesting as the summary. Short version: you do not want to be a chicken in the Southern Sudan as this book details how the Azande deploy the poison oracle over ever significant event in their lives from avenging death (no one just dies, it was witchcraft) to hunting, to adultery. Witchcraft and magic are used by these people to expain patterns in life and while from Pritchard's description they are a wonderful people they still seem to find a lot of reasons for believing their neighbors are out to get them. The study was conducted just as Colonialism was destroying their culture and there is a relation between the upheaval and the destabilization of relationships. There are a few different kinds of oracles but giving chickens strychnine is the most reliable. If you can't afford that you can use the rubbing board or the termite mound. At the same time, the Azande are pretty skeptical about their witchdoctors, acknowledging many to be fake and unreliable and yet necessary. Pritchards is considered a functional anthropologist following the school of Emile Durkheim but this didnt really help me understand that framework of anthropological thinking. ( )
  Hebephrene | Jun 23, 2017 |
Wonderfully written and useful, classic. A reaction against the "pre-logical" theory of Levy-Bruhl. Azande beliefs fairly coherent. E-P could live within this system. Cross-cultural thinking about rationality. Somewhat outdated. ( )
  clifforddham | Feb 3, 2014 |
Evans-Pritchard is well known in the anthropological world as one of the most coherent theoretical writers of all time. His style of fieldwork, largely influenced by Malinowski, is so detailed and precise yet also incredibly interesting to read. His descriptions of oracular addresses and witches are all described as an Azande would describe them: Evans-Pritchard not only records observations, but takes on the persona of the people he is observing. Yet, he still understands the nuances and problems with "becoming" part of the ethnographic study.

In the appendices of this book he talks solely about the art of ethnographic fieldwork. He states, "I found it useful if I wanted to understand how and why Africans are doing certain things to do them myself...But clearly one has to recognize that there is a certain pretence in such attempts at participation, and people do not always appreciate them. One enters into another culture and withdraws from it at the same time...One becomes, at least temporarily, a sort of double marginal man, alienated from both worlds.(emphasis added)"

It is this theoretical concept which makes Evans-Pritchard one of the greatest anthropologists to grace the field. For his time he was relatively objective, yet saw the problem with objectivity (something modern anthropologists are still grappling with: is attempted objectivity at all productive since bias is always manifest?). He grappled with important theoretical questions, all-the-while having a crazy experiences in the field: For example, not only did he participate as a fighter in African tribal wars, he also lost all of his ethnographic fieldwork TWICE! The first time, he actually burnt it himself during WWII, afraid that Italians would find it and use it for their own purposes. Afterwards, he rewrote all his notes from memory, and had them returned home on a ship--but the ship sank! I suggest reading more about him: he was an incredibly complex man with a razor sharp mind. ( )
  SweetbriarPoet | Jan 15, 2012 |
This book is a classic ethnography within anthropology. It continues to be cited in various recent works not only on Africa, but also Amazonia and England.

Its strengths are the absolute thoroughness with which Evans-Pritchard approached this topic. He discusses the Azande beliefs about witchcraft, how these ideas influence their everyday life, witchdoctors and how to become one, and many other topics. Although at times his Western bias shows through, the author is generally careful to relay the information without too much of an ethnocentric point of view.

However, two main points are missing from this text. The first is an equally complete discussion of the role of women in ritual and magic, and also the effects of colonialism upon the Azande. That is not to say that he never mentions women or the British government, but his information is much poorer than on other issues. The introduction by Eva Gillies corrects some of these problems. She gives a brief, but useful history of the Azande and also describes some of the post-colonial changes. To be fair, Evans-Pritchard does mention some changes in Azande culture in his chapter on secret societies.

Although the book is rather divorced from any historical or politcal context which might make the reader feel lost, it is a must read for any anthropologist, or individual interested in witchcraft and sorcery of a specific group of people. ( )
1 vote brlb21 | Oct 31, 2007 |
Exibindo 4 de 4
sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
Você deve entrar para editar os dados de Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Compartilhado.
Título canônico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Lugares importantes
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em Holandês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Eventos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Primeiras palavras
Citações
Últimas palavras
Aviso de desambiguação
Editores da Publicação
Autores Resenhistas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Idioma original
CDD/MDS canônico
LCC Canônico

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês (1)

This acknowledged masterpiece has been abridged to make it more accessible to students. In her introduction, Eva Gillies presents the case for the relevance of the book to modern anthropologists.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo em haiku

Current Discussions

Nenhum(a)

Capas populares

Links rápidos

Avaliação

Média: (3.46)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2 5
2.5
3 12
3.5 3
4 11
4.5 3
5 4

É você?

Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing.

 

Sobre | Contato | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blog | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Históricas | Os primeiros revisores | Conhecimento Comum | 204,466,687 livros! | Barra superior: Sempre visível