Página inicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquise No Site
Este site usa cookies para fornecer nossos serviços, melhorar o desempenho, para análises e (se não estiver conectado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing, você reconhece que leu e entendeu nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade . Seu uso do site e dos serviços está sujeito a essas políticas e termos.
Hide this

Resultados do Google Livros

Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros

Superfreakonomics. L'importanza di essere un…
Carregando...

Superfreakonomics. L'importanza di essere un trans, la polizza vita dei… (original: 2009; edição: 2010)

de Stephen J. Dubner Steven D. Levitt

Séries: Freakonomics (2)

MembrosResenhasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
4,5071161,858 (3.72)78
Whether investigating a solution to global warming or explaining why the price of oral sex has fallen so drastically, Levitt and Dubner mix smart thinking and great storytelling to show how people respond to incentives.
Membro:AlbyVintage
Título:Superfreakonomics. L'importanza di essere un trans, la polizza vita dei kamikaze, l'egoismo dell'altruista: la verità svelata dai numeri
Autores:Stephen J. Dubner Steven D. Levitt
Informação:Sperling & Kupfer (2010), Hardcover
Coleções:Sua biblioteca
Avaliação:*****
Etiquetas:Economia

Detalhes da Obra

SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance de Steven D. Levitt (2009)

Adicionado recentemente portlwright, staunchlyblue, biblioteca privada, lemeeks, Hunted315, toddymalone, Matt_0029, jlweiss
Carregando...

Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Veja também 78 menções

Inglês (113)  Holandês (2)  Italiano (1)  Todos os idiomas (116)
Mostrando 1-5 de 116 (seguinte | mostrar todas)
Interesting, but not nearly as good as their first book. Where the first book was mindblowing and made me look at the world a bit differently, this book was just kind filled with interesting facts or conclusions, but it felt like a bunch of B-sides of ideas that didn't really get fully realized. Not to mention the end just kind of rambled about global warming for a bit, and it didn't really have anything to do with behavioral economics. ( )
  Andjhostet | Jan 11, 2021 |
I liked this a bit more than Freakonomics as it seemed a bit more fresh and new. Interesting topics, though it was still using some slightly suspect assumptions. Some of the conclusions don't take every factor into account. But still a nice diversion in the car and good fodder for conversation. ( )
  JustZelma | Dec 20, 2020 |
I actually didn't like this as much as the first book, but the chapters on healthcare and climate change have excellent analysis and comments on both sides of each issue that shouldn't be missed. ( )
  Ranbato | Dec 17, 2020 |
Overall, most of the book was interesting, but the authors have a tendency to digress and go on a few tangents. Often, it takes them a while to make their actual point for a particular chapter. The chapter on prostitution to me was the most interesting. The last one on global warming, while it raises some interesting ideas, was just too long and overdone. By this point in the book, I was just waiting for the book to end. A little editing could have helped. On the positive, it is not a terribly long book, so you can probably read it in a day or two. It does include extensive notes if you wish to read those as well. If you liked the first book, you will probably like this one too. ( )
  bloodravenlib | Aug 17, 2020 |
Microeconomics.

Ever since I read the first Freakonomics book years ago, I became a super freak and LOVED the real-world expose on things we always seem to take for granted.

Incentives work. Period. They work more to control our behavior than anything else.

Prostitution was huge, years ago, because it paid very well compared to any other kind of work that a woman could do. Often ten times the going rate of anything. Cops turned a blind eye because they could partake of the services. Those other really moral people who tried to stop it found they couldn't because they didn't understand the full circumstances. So what reduced prostitution? Higher wages for women in general. Choice. It was never a matter of morality. It was a matter of going where the money is.

If we compare a geophysical engineering event such as setting off a volcano to combat global warming, it would cost a lot LESS than Al Gore's whole PR campaign that tried to browbeat everyone into altruism. And it would be more effective.

The threat of terrorism is often much more effective than actual terrorism. So put away your bomb and just do some more talking about it.

Microeconomics uses real data, is only as effective as the questions being posed, but is still extremely interesting. And enlightening.

Car seats for kids? No statistical difference in saving kids' lives versus seat belts. The seat belts are the real saviors. So instead of having this huge weird industry with mismatching standards for car seats, why don't we have cars with easily adjustable seatbelts?

HELLO?

The numbers don't lie. But human psychology is FULL of blind spots.

Like doctors and washing hands. To find out that one hospital's doctors only washed their hands 9% of the time they OUGHT to have been washing their hands, proven by swabs and analysis of their hands, versus their self-reporting of 60% or so? Or the other many excuses such as time and effort? No incentive fixed that situation better than putting screensavers up on all the computers that showed a magnification of a single caught doctor's hand.


What kind of truly effective incentives do we need to roll out now, with the Coronavirus? Will washing hands truly make the grade? Maybe we should all get a picture of the virus for our screensavers.

But will that take care of all the people who don't WANT to take it seriously? Those people who will prolong the problem for everyone else by spreading it to their friends and neighbors and to their own family members... all of whom might be trying, very carefully, to quarantine themselves?

Maybe we need a shame bell. The same shame bell that was so ... yeah ... in Game of Thrones. ( )
  bradleyhorner | Jun 1, 2020 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 116 (seguinte | mostrar todas)
Levitt and co-author Stephen Dubner's new book "Super Freakonomics" is a follow-up to their super smash 2005 bestseller, "Freakonomics." Thank goodness they are back -- with wisdom, wit and, most of all, powerful economic insight.
adicionado por Shortride | editarLos Angeles Times, Gregory D. Hess (Oct 27, 2009)
 
If ever two writers were likely to suffer from "difficult second book" syndrome, it's Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, authors of the smash-hit Freakonomics, which made them the rock stars of the economics world.
adicionado por fannyprice | editarThe Guardian, David Runciman (Oct 25, 2009)
 
The economist and the journalist again attack the concept of the rational man, via studies involving monkeys, banking records, and doctors. Yet there’s an artfulness missing this time around in their circuitous paths toward obvious conclusions like “technology isn’t always better” and “men and women are different.”
adicionado por Shortride | editarThe A. V. Club, Ellen Wernecke (Oct 24, 2009)
 
The difficulty with the book is that while the focus may be fairly fuzzy to begin with, it gets a lot fuzzier as it goes on. There’s a long passage about how people behave differently when they’re being scrutinised – thus making a nonsense of most behavioural experiments – and an even longer one about global warming.
 

» Adicionar outros autores (2 possíveis)

Nome do autorFunçãoTipo de autorObra?Status
Steven D. Levittautor principaltodas as ediçõescalculado
Dubner, Stephen J.autor principaltodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Você deve entrar para editar os dados de Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Compartilhado.
Título canônico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Lugares importantes
Eventos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Premiações
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Primeiras palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Many of life's decisions are hard.
Citações
Últimas palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
(Clique para mostrar. Atenção: Pode conter revelações sobre o enredo.)
Aviso de desambiguação
Editores da Publicação
Autores Resenhistas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Idioma original
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
CDD/MDS canônico
Whether investigating a solution to global warming or explaining why the price of oral sex has fallen so drastically, Levitt and Dubner mix smart thinking and great storytelling to show how people respond to incentives.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo em haiku

Links rápidos

Capas populares

Avaliação

Média: (3.72)
0.5 1
1 6
1.5 5
2 78
2.5 15
3 285
3.5 93
4 434
4.5 30
5 209

Penguin Australia

2 edições deste livro foram publicadas por Penguin Australia.

Edições: 0141030704, 1846143039

É você?

Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing.

 

Sobre | Contato | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blog | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Históricas | Os primeiros revisores | Conhecimento Comum | 157,801,171 livros! | Barra superior: Sempre visível