As usual, Norwich is an entertaining guide through an often-overlooked (in comparison to England, France, Spain) area of Eurpoean history.

His fondness for the city, resulting in copious footnotes marking where various tombs and monuments are now located, can get a bit oppressive.

Unlike Byzantium (to which I have to admit only having read the digest version; the three-colume epic is far down on the to-read), the history of Venice is rather dull, making this a slow but ultimately rewarding read. ( )

Although weighty in both the literal and metaphorical sense of the word, this turned out to be quite a worthwhile book. It covers the history of Venice from 421 CE to 1797 CE. The Most Serene Republic was therefore a republic longer than anywhere else on the planet – and, depending on how sticky you are about the term “republic”, quite possibly longer than all the others combined.


Author John Julius Norwich has an easy-to-read style, and considerable dry humor (although he often saves that for the footnotes). Nonetheless there’s far too much history to go over, so I’ll comment on some of the things that interested me:


To what extent was Venice actually a “republic”? It seemed to work fairly well, using a system of checks and balances. The legislative and executive branches were held by the nobility; the civil service and judiciary were controlled by the commoners. The Republic was almost morbidly afraid of any one noble family getting too much power, especially after the examples of the Medicis, Borgias, and Sforzas; hence the procedure for electing the Doge was as follows:


The youngest member of the Council of State went to St. Mark’s to pray, then;

He stopped the first boy he met and took him to the Doge’s palace, then;

The boy picked slips of paper from an urn, choosing 30 members of the Great Council, then;

Another round of lots reduced the 30 to 9, then;

The nine met and voted for 40, each of which had to receive at least seven votes, then;

The 40 were reduced by lot to 12, then;

The 12 voted for 25, each of whom had to get 9 votes, then;

The 25 were reduced by lot to 9, then;

The nine voted for 45, with seven votes each, then;

The 45 were reduced by lot to 11, then;

The 11 voted for 41, each of whom had to get at least 9 votes, then;

Each of the 41 voted for a Doge by secret ballot, then;

Everyone who had been nominated by the 41 got one lot, regardless of the number of nominations received, then;

A lot was drawn, the nominee was invited to answer questions, and a vote was taken. If he received 25 votes, he was Doge; if not a second name was drawn and so on until a Doge was elected.


And I thought the Electoral College was complicated. The interesting thing about this is that the Doge never really had any power. He got a vote on the Council of State, but that was it. On the other hand, he was very much a Head of State; he received visiting dignitaries in splendor, held State banquets, and was generally the visible symbol of Venice. Being elected Doge was often the reward for somebody who had devoted a lot of time to government service – sort of a retirement package.


Venice was one of the few places in medieval Europe where the nobility openly engaged in trade; and they seemed to take the attitude that what was good for business was good for Venice, and vice versa (and they seem to have been quite right). Venice was almost notoriously tolerant for the time; intolerance was bad for business. There were synagogues, an Orthodox church, a mosque, and Protestant churches when the time came. This got the Republic in trouble with the Papacy on several occasions; in other European countries a woman convicted of witchcraft was tied to a post and burned alive; in Venice she had to stand in a public square for an hour while wearing a witch’s hat. The brutes.


Norwich explains another thing that had puzzled me ever since I read a biography of courtesan/poetess Victoria Franco. Courtesans had to register; at one time in the 1500s where the register was preserved, there were 11564 of them out of a population of about 100000. This seemed amazing to me; if you consider that half of that 100000 is eliminated by gender, and of the remaining 50000 a good chunk must have been ineligible due to age or inclination, it would seem that about half of the potential women in Venice were in the business. I’m all for free trade, but that still seems a bit excessive. However, Norwich explains two factors that figured in. One was the nobility of Venice, which over the years developed multitudinous cadet branches and family linkages, adopted the policy of meeting in conclave and deciding who was going to carry on the family in each generation, avoiding endless subdivisions of the family wealth. Thus most of the nobility and probably most of the wealthier commoners never married; as an example, fully 60% of the Doges were bachelors. Well, men will be men and single women have to make a living. A second factor was Venice’s reputation as the Las Vegas of the day; tourists came from all over to partake. (One of the most interesting was Henry III of France, who had managed to get himself crowned King of Poland; however when his elder brother Charles died and left the throne vacant to him, he decided Paris was more attractive than Warsaw and fled in the middle of the night, taking the Polish state treasury with him. He managed to stop in Venice on the way home – not quite on the direct route – and was treated royally by the Venetians, choosing female companionship from a portfolio of paintings prepared for the purpose. See Dangerous Beauty and Queen Margot). All that activity made for a lot of orphans, but Venice even managed to turn that to advantage – Vivaldi and lesser musicians used the orphans as choirs and orchestras.


I can’t do justice to such a large book in a short review, but I recommend it highly; there’s a lot more of interest than just what I’ve commented on. ( )

Another absolutely brilliant book by John Julius Norwich. Incredibly researched, full of amazing details (and the wisdom to have skipped all those details when they didn't contribute to the story), and beautifully written with just the right touch of wry wit. A book that one can return to many times and always come away from richer. Worth the investment in every way. ( )

This is a beautifully-written book. Norwich writes of Venice's remarkable history with humour and affection for his subject. Despite wading through a great quantity of detail through the Republic's thousand-year history, Norwich managed to hold my interest throughout. The book was heavy going at times but this was more due to the multifarious cast of little-known (to me) characters than to any fault of the author. This is a fine introduction to a fascinating subject. ( )

Splendido modo di raccontare la storia di un territorio, è inutile dire che sono un fan di Norwich, del suo modo di raccontare. ( )