Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros
Carregando... Simplexity (edição: 2008)de Jeffrey Kluger
Informações da ObraSimplexity: Why Simple Things Become Complex de Jeffrey Kluger
Nenhum(a) Carregando...
Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. Again, done in the tradition of Freakonomics, Sway, and Quirkology, this is an accessible book that encourages the reader to look at both nature and technology in different, nontraditional ways. I appreciated the fact that the author recognized complexity science's limitations throughout the book, especially in areas that had to do with the arts. He was able, however, to make excellent points about patterns that occur in all sorts of other areas, like language, sports, and molecular structure, just to name a few. I'm drawn to these types of books that respect my intelligence but still manage to teach me something new. Another fascinating read. Esta resenha foi escrita no âmbito dos Primeiros Resenhistas do LibraryThing. Came away wishing that in all those words, there was deeper insight into the ideas explored. sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
Draws on cutting-edge theories to describe the basic workings of everyday objects and principles in accessible language, covering a wide variety of topics from cell phones and viruses to economics and parenting. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Revisores inicias do LibraryThingO livro de Jeffrey Kluger, Simplexity: Why Simple Things Become Complex (And How Complex Things Can Be Made Simple), estava disponível em LibraryThing Early Reviewers. Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
Google Books — Carregando... GênerosClassificação decimal de Dewey (CDD)501Natural sciences and mathematics General Science Philosophy and theoryClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing. |
A few diagrams and a system of subheadings, introductory and concluding paragraphs, and some sort of clearly laid out road map for each chapter might have helped, but focusing on fewer subjects and covering them more thoroughly would also have made a huge improvement. After all, the point of this book was, I am guessing, the shapes and dynamics of systems and problems, rather than sports, music, infectious diseases, or any of the other subjects Klugman introduced. Focusing more on these underlying similarities of shape and dynamics and less on distracting the reader with yet another new subject would bring the underlying structures more into focus. ( )