Página inicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquise No Site
Este site usa cookies para fornecer nossos serviços, melhorar o desempenho, para análises e (se não estiver conectado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing, você reconhece que leu e entendeu nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade . Seu uso do site e dos serviços está sujeito a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados do Google Livros

Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros

The Complete Works of William Shakespeare de…

The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (original: 1623; edição: 2017)

de William Shakespeare (Autor)

MembrosResenhasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
31,94217085 (4.59)439
Presents the works of William Shakespeare, along with an analysis of the nature and authority of the early documents, a list of the canon and chronological order of composition, an essay on Shakespeare's language, and a bibliography.
Título:The Complete Works of William Shakespeare
Autores:William Shakespeare (Autor)
Informação:BeyondBooks (2017), 1227 pages
Coleções:Sua biblioteca

Informações da Obra

The Complete Works of William Shakespeare de William Shakespeare (1623)

  1. 101
    Asimov's Guide to Shakespeare: A Guide to Understanding and Enjoying the Works of Shakespeare de Isaac Asimov (shurikt)
    shurikt: What would a SF writer know about Shakespeare? A lot, apparently. This is a great book to refresh your memory before the occasional Shakespeare in the Park -- if you don't want to read the play again.
  2. 30
    The Oxford Anthology of English Literature: Volume II: The Literature of Renaissance England de John Hollander (MissBrangwen)
  3. 42
    Shakespeare and Co.: Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Dekker, Ben Jonson, Thomas Middleton, John Fletcher and the Other Players in His Story de Stanley Wells (akfarrar)
    akfarrar: Editor and Shakespeare Scholar - Wells
  4. 12
    Haunt Me Still de Jennifer Lee Carrell (kraaivrouw)
  5. 58
    A Dictionary of the English Language: An Anthology (Penguin Classics) de Samuel Johnson (Voracious_Reader)
    Voracious_Reader: He refers to all sorts of authors, but most frequently Shakespeare.
  6. 711
    Hamlet de William Shakespeare (Pattty)
    Pattty: Si te gustó Hamlet seguro te gustará Macbeth, que es una historia buena y mucho más "macabra"

Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Veja também 439 menções

Inglês (162)  Espanhol (2)  Holandês (2)  Catalão (1)  Italiano (1)  Alemão (1)  Todos os idiomas (169)
Mostrando 1-5 de 169 (seguinte | mostrar todas)
What an exquisite edition of one of the greatest works in the Western canon. Armed with an authoritative editorial team, Professor Jonathan Bate has reworked all of Shakespeare's plays, as well as his poems. The footnotes are extensive and cover all meanings of words (including the more salacious ones that many school texts leave out), while also providing informative historical and contextual information.

This edition seeks to give us every word attributed to Shakespeare (although, as it points out at length, we can't really know what he wrote: all of our current versions come from a variety of sources typeset in his later years, and primarily from the First Folio printed after his death. Any work of the Bard's is distorted in some way). With appendices and footnotes, notable textual errors or areas of debate are highlighted.

There is so much to love here. Epic tragedies - Antony and Cleopatra, Julius Caesar, Hamlet, King Lear - joined by their lesser, but poetically affecting counterparts like Othello, Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet and Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare plays with and shuffles around comic tropes in his wide variety of comedies: peaks include The Comedy of Errors, Love's Labour's Lost, A Midsummer Night's Dream and Much Ado About Nothing.

In his more subdued romances, Shakespeare often seems reduced to more typical characters yet imbues than with layer upon layer of subtlety: Measure for Measure and The Winter's Tale are particularly splendid examples. Some of the tragedies and comedies aren't as startling, and some are challenging - such as his part-satire Troilus and Cressida - but every work brims with characters whose opinions, beliefs and motives are individual, and not simply echoing those of an author. Beyond these plays lies a staggering cycle of love poems in The Sonnets, as well as his other various poetry which always makes fascinating, lyrical reading.

Capping all this is Shakespeare's incredible cycle of English history, which details the country's fate from 1199 to 1533, through the stories of the English monarchs: their battles, their loves, their lives and the effect their squabbles have over countless citizens. The cycle begins with the somewhat talky King John (far from my favourite work, but well presented in the BBC Complete Works cycle) and ends with the autumnal King Henry VIII. In between are eight plays (two tetraologies) which encompass the Wars of the Roses, and they are astonishing. From the private thoughts of the monarch to the most unimportant peasant, Shakespeare captures an age.

The introductions on each play detail cultural successes over the centuries, as well as basic historical information. I've seen people suggest other aspects that could improve this - such as a suggestion of ways to double parts (this is defined as the "actor's edition"). Certainly, I can accept that, but as it stands this is already beyond a 5-star piece of work. A place of honour on my shelf, that's for sure. ( )
  therebelprince | Apr 21, 2024 |
I got this in a box of "junk" at a swap meet in San Diego around 1988. I had one of those readings done on objects...that reading indicated this book went from a book store in England to a wealthy home library, then across the pond to the USA, owned by an old maid in New England and somehow made it's way to San Diego. There is also a heavy indication of Ships and rough seas???

My copy is leather embossed, the cover is in tough shape, and not getting any better. I use this mostly as reference material as the copy is still perfect and easy to read.

Great Book 2 gazillion Stars ( )
  AlphaSierra1963 | Jan 6, 2024 |
A great volume to have all of Shakespeare's plays (or almost all) in one place on the bookshelf, I found that the older I got, the more I appreciated reading each play in its own volume, or in a volume of three or four plays. The print is tiny in two column format.
  MrsLee | Nov 26, 2023 |
Well, there’s no use—no good, I mean—trying to be like one of those awful people who read all the intentionally ruined books about Shakespeare, written out of a desire to hide in baroque manor houses and to neither be understood nor to understand: such being the calling of the intellectual, to be holy, to be set apart, and what better way than not to speak the speech of men. But the thing itself, aside from the uses the horse is put to, is rather good. And plenty of popular books do draw on Shakespeare and use his plots and other gifts—were I only to name one or two of the most obvious, bitches would moan with the dying, and bite their wrists, so that the red blood would flow. I don’t know. Obviously Shakespeare is the best-received and actually too I think the best and most free-thinking writer of his day, though of course sometimes there are the inevitable marks of, I hesitate to say inaccuracy, since I am no historicist, but there are the marks of popular delusion, ignorance, and viciousness: the vipers of the common brute and bully, that the old soul, if you like, the thrice-born—what’s the opposite of ‘once-born’?—must deal with. As grey as later more German centuries would be, sometimes things were not really a certain way because Shakespeare said so, and obviously before he got to have his say he had to look a certain way, you know. But I do look forward to polishing off the last seven plays and the poetry. When I read the Bard, the titles of books dance in my head, and the epigraph pages of books either wonderful, or fantastic, or impossible to write. Of course, there’s a reason why people use Hallmark or whatever instead of Shakespeare quotes when somebody gets married, because aside from the 5,000 pages or whatever of pre-modern English, there’s the issue that every line almost is beautiful in its sound, but every other line deals with battles or poison or planning suicide and such, so you know. “Why is uncle goosecap implying that I should kill myself on my birthday”?

But if you think you can, take a few years and read the whole thing; it’s worth doing it that’s your sort of thing.

…. As I write this, I’m finishing up the last tragedy, the Athens Tim one—a bad play, at least in so far as what people would make of it, you know, but a lot of things are like that; I guess I buy the character, but people would remember their own imagined passive-aggressive rants about friends and money and assume that two and two don’t need to make four in their own life because they readin’ da Bard, you know: people are so terrible because it’s like if you let the girl who was supposed to play Tiger Lilly but wasn’t white enough play an Athens Tim character, people would cry for blood and prison, and still believe in lack, naturally, but okay, break’s over—but yeah so then I’ve got about a thousand (few-words-each) pages, less than 20%, now, even, and just five more plays, the ‘romances’, and the ‘poetry’, right. And then I’ll have read Homer (in English, naturally), Jane Austen (minus ‘the teenage writings’), and Shakespeare—and then, you know, I’d still like the read Dickens and the Brontes, and read internationally more, and more like ordinary middlebrow lit, and a few more classics eventually, sure, and lots of common stuff: but I feel like I’ve read enough where I no longer have to prove myself by reading the biggest names anymore, since I’ve read a handful of big names extensively and others more occasionally, and like I knew I wasn’t planning on reading every Joseph Conrad, At All Costs, and then I read Heart of Darkness & Other Stories and it’s like, Wow, what a wordy dick, you know….

And even more, now: it’s a relief to get closer to a point where I could take a long break, even in principles, from a certain sort of thing, eventually, I mean.

…. Also: the really conformist critic tries to narrow it to the tragedies, although those are certainly worthy, containing both Romeo & Juliet, and Hamlet, and others: but the comedies are great, too; I feel like I’ve already forgotten what little I understood of Love’s Labour Lost, but it makes a beautiful duet with Two Gentlemen of Verona, and the classic mask thing in Measure for Measure was excellent; the common stuff movies that are made in similar comedic tones should have the guts to throw out Measure for Measure instead of pretending Hamlet, though they never do, you know—the narrowing critic is the key…. I wish I remember As You Like It and I think I’ll have to see a movie version; of course, the Venice Jew play is terribly racist, and they are in general rather elitist in the several ways, although rather less so, I think, than was common then, or indeed later.

…. And when I was reading the old tale of England’s King Henry VI, I was Henry VI; surely some charm crossed my path, before all that ended, in those days when I was that Good Man, so turned by harm’s negation, even to the exclusion.

…. Although it is true that I read it just as an overview, and indeed sometimes read and only got a vague sense of the plot—and sometimes didn’t care much about whoever it was.

…. I have to say in the light of history, (although lit isn’t the most unpopular subject, though men strive to make it such, who command it), that I find it strange that in most of our schools education is a service being provided to the students, one would think, though they have no control over what they study or how. It’s as though the students were there to serve—yes, to serve the dead!

That being said, there’s a wonderful subjectivity in Shakespeare—even more so than in Plato. One character speaks second, and people might walk away thinking that they’ve heard “Shakespeare”, but then before them there was another character, who also spoke, who believed another way. “They can’t both be right,” howls the theologian.

…. (The king guy is swearing he’ll kill everybody because he thinks his wife is cheating even though she’s not)
(Mabel from “Gravity Falls”) He talks with a crazy voice!


…. “The art itself is Nature”
And surely Nature encompasses all the arts of men.

…. There are some fun Shakespeare comedies/romances like Midsummer’s Night and Tempest, but people tend to look to the high culture for serious shit, you know; from our perspective it’s kinda a mixed form, with the poetry purists neglecting it or at least not pushing it as hard, (and they do try to push, even as they push it far from the byways of ordinary men), whereas for entertainment in general, things turn over rather quicker than all that—Shakie, looming larger in isolation, is the biggest single author of the past these days, although he might not be bigger than Regency Jane and Victorian Charles put together, for what it’s worth…. For a magic-in-literature it can be great—‘High Magic’s Aid’, or, ‘The Tempest’, children?—but to a certain audience it doesn’t scream ‘fun’, you know. Which is obvs what it was written for, at the end of the day—that piece, especially.

…. This is a truism of the lit crits, but maybe it needs to be said again: the Victorians didn’t really love Shakespeare as much as they convinced themselves they did, you know.

…. Although in a lot of the poetry, the historical atmosphere becomes a lot more obvious— white/purity (and the slaves groan) vs ‘dark’ good-time-girl (and the slaves GROAN), you know.

O desire BLACK
All good you lack
The lips you smack
Thou shall I ne’er fack

You know; it’s like—I don’t know what it’s about rightly, but it isn’t about rape. It’s about drinking with your male friends in the back of the Poetry Club, snobbish even when you’re tipsy, you know.

(And what could be better than that!)

…. I mean, it is possible to desire sex in so disorderly a way that you forget all about the issue of the girl’s consent, but there’s a lot more to sex than that, and a lot more to the bad thing than just sex—but the Lucrece poem just thinks sex is the bad, bad thing. And there’s no sense in it of a violated Will—at all…. It’s very inbred: inbred aristocracy. I suppose if we can take them both as a piece, the plays are much better than the poetry.

…. It is curious to know, that these manor house men, with their self-praise and their expectations for others, did not always have good relationships with others or fine things—no, just servants, and twice-worn-out things. And, yes, dependents, and a tradition to which they themselves were dependent. Barren rhyme, and word’s annoy, and for the child no slight-weight assumption.

…. Bro: even ‘The Merry Wives of Windsor’ is better than the sonnets.

The sonnets are like, Billy’s gifts to parodists, you know.

…. But it is interesting, how even the critic, the critical man, has in his opinion drifted from seeing the sonnets/poetry as the best, towards the tragedies—the ‘better’ part of the scandalous trash, you know, the plays. The future critic will probably look with widest smiles on the middlebrow lit of today, you know. I mean, the only way to write something today and have it be immediately highbrow is to have it be ludicrously imitative, you know—the highbrow is for the dead. Really you have to be middlebrow to be creative, really. And the bottom feeders fill up, at least; puritans talk about Jane Austen mythologists as though they were mafiosi, you know.

…. If you read school-lit, take a few years and read the whole thing, but don’t believe that it didn’t happen during the Atlantic slave trade because of me, you know.

And don’t think that the only lit is pure-mental-lit: the only proper thing, sharpening the knives of the mind, the swords of the animating soul, because for this reason did man come forth—to fight wars for his mind’s sake, right….

And it’s certainly not that it wasn’t written by a white man, because certainly it was, but I think a lot of the youth’s Fee Fi Fo Fum I smell the blood of an Englishman thing often has to do with just not seeing the value or benefit in their own lives, when they don’t feel like it was written for them, and what was, is considered little fae crap, you know—and because it takes a lot of courage, more than the average person has, to stand up and say, I shouldn’t have to read crap I don’t like and pretend I talk about things I don’t like in a way I don’t talk—you know, the shame, the SHAME, that would be associated with that—they hide it behind fee fi fo fum, right. And, yeah, he also thought that Black girls were ugly because they looked like slaves. Well, Black girls, and possibly Italians, you know—it was a different world.

And I don’t know how you argue, ‘Don’t shame the children’, but maybe, ah, Don’t fucking do it. “Ah, my good man. But then shall we not be intellectuals. We shall go on shaming the children. It is our way.”

(end) But now I have an idea what Shakespeare I want to have another look at. Plays, more than three; wordings, two; and indeed for each trio, adaptions doubled perhaps more than once, as the decades speak more than once.

…. (end/final) Incidentally, I do think that more than 7% of a story is verbal; very little of it, it’s true, is that literal-verbal level, but suggestion and style that’s at least partially verbal says more than the literal meaning of the literal words say.

But aside from Poems for the Boys’ Club’s Backroom, you know—most of it was meant to be performed, and ultimately in life, physical and verbal intelligence are meant to cooperate. The tyranny of verbal intelligence of the critic is just…. Empire, you know. It’s the Atlantic slave trade, basically. The critic thinks that what separates him from the slave is his only true worth; the actor and the good poet, not so much.
  goosecap | Nov 13, 2023 |
A mediocre Shakespeare collection. Not comprehensively stuffed with annotations and commentary like the Arden series nor light and easy to transport like the Folger collection. Even compared to other Shakespeare 'complete works' volumes, its cover is cheaply made and the preliminary essay is saccharine and factually inaccurate. But, Shakespeare's writing can elevate even the most poorly made of publications ( )
  Liam223 | Aug 14, 2023 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 169 (seguinte | mostrar todas)
There are moments when one asks despairingly why our stage should ever have been cursed with this "immortal" pilferer of other men's stories and ideas, with his monstrous rhetorical fustian, his unbearable platitudes, his pretentious reduction of the subtlest problems of life to commonplaces against which a Polytechnic debating club would revolt, his incredible unsuggestiveness, his sententious combination of ready reflection with complete intellectual sterility, and his consequent incapacity for getting out of the depth of even the most ignorant audience, except when he solemnly says something so transcendently platitudinous that his more humble-minded hearers cannot bring themselves to believe that so great a man really meant to talk like their grandmothers.

With the single exception of Homer, there is no eminent writer, not even Sir Walter Scott, whom I can despise so entirely as I despise Shakespear when I measure my mind against his. The intensity of my impatience with him occasionally reaches such a pitch, that it would positively be a relief to me to dig him up and throw stones at him, knowing as I do how incapable he and his worshippers are of understanding any less obvious form of indignity. To read Cymbeline and to think of Goethe, of Wagner, of Ibsen, is, for me, to imperil the habit of studied moderation of statement which years of public responsibility as a journalist have made almost second nature in me.
adicionado por SnootyBaronet | editarThe Saturday Review, George Bernard Shaw (Sep 26, 1896)

» Adicionar outros autores (80 possíveis)

Nome do autorFunçãoTipo de autorObra?Status
Shakespeare, Williamautor principaltodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Abel, RayIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Ackroyd, PeterIntroduçãoautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Alexander, PeterEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Atkins, EileenNarradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Ball, RobertIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Barnet, SylvanEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Bate, JonathanEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Baudissin, Wolf Heinrich GrafTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Beck, IanIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Bell, Henry GlassfordEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Bell, Henry GlassfordIntroduçãoautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Bevington, DavidEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Black, Walter J.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Bodenstedt, FriedrichTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Bourus, TeriEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Brangwyn, FrankIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Braunmuller, A. R.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Brickdale, Eleanor F.Ilustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Brockbank, PhilipIntroduçãoautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Brooke, C. F. TuckerEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Bullen, A. H.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Chalmers, AlexanderEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Clark, William GeorgeEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Cohen, WalterEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Coleridge, Samuel TaylorContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Collier, J. PayneEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Cornwall, BarryContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Courteaux, WillyTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Craig, HardinEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Craig, W. J.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Cross, Wilbur L.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Dicksee, Sir Francis BernardIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Dyce, AlexanderContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Egan, GabrielEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Ervine, St. JohnEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Evans, G. BlakemoreEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Freiligrath, FerdinandTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Gilbert, Sir JohnIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Gollancz, IsraelEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Greenblatt, Stephen J.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Greer, GermaineContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Halliwell-Phillipps, J. O.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Harbage, AlfredEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Hardy, DudleyIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Harrison, G. B.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Harrison, G. B.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Harvey, Sir PaulIntroduçãoautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Hazlitt, WilliamContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Herford, C. H.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Hodek, BřetislavIntroduçãoautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Horne, R.H.Contribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Howard, Jean E.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Hudson, Henry N.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Johnson, SamuelContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Johnson, SamuelEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Jowett, JohnEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Kent, RockwellIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Kernan, Alvin B.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Kittredge, George LymanEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Knight, CharlesEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Lee, SidneyContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Losey, Frederick DouglasEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Mabie, Hamilton WrightPosfácioautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Macready, William Charlesautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Malone, EdmondEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Marks, DarrylPrefácioautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Matterson, T. M.Ilustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Maus, Katharine E.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Meadows, KennyIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Milton, JohnContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Morley, ChristopherPrefácioautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Moston, DougIntroduçãoautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Orgel, StephenEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Papp, JosephPrefácioautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Pope, AlexanderEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Porter, CharlotteEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Rackham, ArthurIlustradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Rasmussen, EricEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Reed, IsaacEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Regis, Johann GottlobTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Ribner, IrvingEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Rolfe, W. J.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Sénéchal, HéloïseEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Schücking, Levin LudwigEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Schepps, Solomon J.Prefácioautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Schlegel, August Wilhelm vonContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Schlegel, August Wilhelm vonTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Simrock, KarlTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Sisson, Charles JasperEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Smith, Hallett D.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Staunton, HowardEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Steevens, GeorgeEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Swinburne, Algernon CharlesContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Syme, Holger SchottIntroduçãoautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Taylor, GaryEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Theobald, LewisEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Thompson, AnnEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Thorndike, SybilPrefácioautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Tieck, DorotheaTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Tieck, LudwigTradutorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Warburton, WilliamEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Wells, Stanley W.Editorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
White, Richard GrantContribuinteautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Wilson, John DoverEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Wolfit, Sir DonaldPrefácioautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Wright, William AldisEditorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado

Pertence à série publicada


É reescrito em

Tem a adaptação

É parodiada em


Tem como guia de referência/texto acompanhante

Tem um comentário sobre o texto

Has as a concordance

Você deve entrar para editar os dados de Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Compartilhado.
Título canônico
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Data da publicação original
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Lugares importantes
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Eventos importantes
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Filmes relacionados
Primeiras palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
William Shakespeare's date of birth is not precisely known, but it probably preceded his baptism on April 26, 1564, in Stratfordon-Avon, by only a few days.
There is no proof that Shakespeare personally superintended the printing of any of his plays.
Publisher's Preface: In the words of the First Folio of 1623, "The Riverside Shakespeare" is addressed 'To the great Variety of Readers.  From the most able, to him that can but spell.'" - Harold T. Miller, President Houghton Mifflin Company
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Hell is empty, and all the devils are here.
- (The Tempest, Act 1, Scene 2, Line 213)
Últimas palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
(Clique para mostrar. Atenção: Pode conter revelações sobre o enredo.)
Aviso de desambiguação
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
This work contains all works written by Shakespeare – this is not the Complete Plays only. Shakespeare wrote sonnets and poems in addition to the plays.
Editores da Publicação
Autores Resenhistas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Idioma original
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
CDD/MDS canônico
LCC Canônico
Presents the works of William Shakespeare, along with an analysis of the nature and authority of the early documents, a list of the canon and chronological order of composition, an essay on Shakespeare's language, and a bibliography.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo em haiku

Current Discussions


Capas populares

Links rápidos


Média: (4.59)
0.5 5
1 9
1.5 1
2 26
2.5 10
3 189
3.5 36
4 623
4.5 117
5 2077

É você?

Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing.


Sobre | Contato | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blog | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Históricas | Os primeiros revisores | Conhecimento Comum | 207,078,362 livros! | Barra superior: Sempre visível