Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros
Carregando... Serious Noticing: Selected Essays, 1997-2019de James Wood
Nenhum(a) Carregando...
Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. I've read many of these essays in earlier volumes, but it didn't spoil reading this volume of selected essays from James Woods. A very serious noticer. The couple of essays I loved least were mainly about writers Woods does not enjoy, Paul Auster for example (someone who's work I do enjoy, especially early to mid work). Among favourite pieces, though I loved so many: What Chekhov meant by life The Other Side of Silence: W G Sebald Virginia Woolf's Mysticism Pieces on favourite writers of mine I note. Another volume of literary chocolate for me. As my sister pointed out when I said that to her, 'calorie free'. sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
The definitive collection of literary essays byThe New Yorker's award-winning longtime book critic Ever since the publication of his first essay collection,The Broken Estate, in 1999, James Wood has been widely regarded as a leading literary critic of the English-speaking world. His essays on canonical writers (Gustav Flaubert, Herman Melville), recent legends (Don DeLillo, Marilynne Robinson) and significant contemporaries (Zadie Smith, Elena Ferrante) have established a standard for informed and incisive appreciation, composed in a distinctive literary style all their own. Together, Wood's essays, and his bestsellingHow Fiction Works, share an abiding preoccupation with how fiction tells its own truths, and with the vocation of the writer in a world haunted by the absence of God. InSerious Noticing, Wood collects his best essays from two decades of his career, supplementing earlier work with autobiographical reflections from his bookThe Nearest Thing to Life and recent essays fromThe New Yorker on young writers of extraordinary promise. The result is an essential guide to literature in the new millennium. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
Google Books — Carregando... GênerosClassificação decimal de Dewey (CDD)824.92Literature English & Old English literatures English essays Modern Period 21st centuryClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing. |
I started by skipping the first essay, "The Fun Stuff: Homage to Keith Moon." I do not like rock music, the Who, or Keith Moon. But as I leafed forward to the next, the final paragraph caught my eye: Wood's affectionate mention of the two versions of the Goldberg Variations recorded by Glenn Gould - a beloved topic in our house, and in which he agrees with me. So: when it comes to Wood, there be gems buried even among the apparent dross. From Moon (ick) to Chekhov (yay!), Bellow (whom he admires and I can't bear) to Austen, Cormac McCarthy (not in my house) to Dostoevsky's God (not that he himself isn't nearly one). And just as I was getting very testy with him about his criticisms of Dickens's writing and characters (see my defense of those beloved people HERE), he delights me with a shrewd and loving observation on what saves them: "Yet in Dickens there is always an immediate access to strong feeling, which tears the puppetry of his people breaks their casings, and lets us enter them. Mr. Micawber may be a caricature, a simple, univocal essence, but he feels, and he makes us feel." You are forgiven, Mr. Wood, and I'm going to steal those lines and add them to my blog post.
Even when discussing a writer whom I have tried to read and turned away from for good and all (McCarthy), Wood satisfies because he is not afraid to voice the criticisms, to point out where they fall short or fail outright, but can explain to a skeptic what he may be trying to do, what he IS in fact achieving, and how he does it. Sometimes it's puzzling: he cites a paragraph from The Road as "gorgeous," which I have read a dozen times and still can't make sense of. But I learned something. The Melville essay is a long, dense, very difficult slog; he shines a light on a Jane Austen innovation; the pieces on Dostoevsky and Orwell are passionate and moving, and he is wonderful on Tolstoy. If you already value a particular author, he will give you additional cause and understanding to do so; if you don't, he'll give you something to make you cock your head and be glad you read that chapter anyway.
Wood himself loves, loves, LOVES adjectives, which endears him to me. A fifty-something headmaster as his boyhood school seems "fantastically antique" to his students, holding a burning-down match in his fingertips with "reptilian imperviousness." The Goldberg versions are described thus: "The first aria is cocky, exuberant, optimistic, vital, fun, sound-filled; the second aria is reflective, seasoned, wintry, grieving, silence-haunted." So, MFA pundits who decree you must get rid of your adjectives and adverbs, put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Intelligent, challenging, varied - pick and choose, have some patience, and you will be rewarded, and sometimes bored. Still worth the trip. ( )