Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros
Carregando... The U.S. Constitution: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)de David J. Bodenhamer
Nenhum(a) Carregando...
Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
Pertence à série
"Though the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, its impact on our lives is as recent as today's news. Claims and counterclaims about the constitutionality of governmental actions are a habit of American politics. This document, which its framers designed to limit power, often has made political conflict inevitable. It also has accommodated and legitimized the political and social changes of a vibrant, powerful democratic nation. A product of history's first modern revolution, the Constitution embraced a new formula for government: it restrained power on behalf of liberty, but it also granted power to promote and protect liberty. The U.S. Constitution: A Very Short Introduction explores the major themes that have shaped American constitutional history: federalism, the balance of powers, property, representation, equality, rights, and security. Informed by the latest scholarship, this book places constitutional history within the context of American political and social history. As our nation's circumstances have changed, so has our Constitution. Today we face serious challenges to the nation's constitutional legacy. Endless wars, a sharply divided electorate, economic inequality, and immigration, along with a host of other issues, have placed demands on government and on society that test our constitutional values. Understanding how the Constitution has evolved will help us adapt its principles to the challenges of our age"--Provided by the publisher. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
Google Books — Carregando... GênerosClassificação decimal de Dewey (CDD)342.7302Social sciences Law Constitutional and administrative law North America Constitutional law--United States Basic instruments of Government, the US constitutionClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing. |
…. I mean, I know that once when I lived in the femme mystique village, I happened to hear an old white man say, I don’t care if we have an immigrant woman doctor—but I also want people to know that we have the Constitution!— And having kinda a Disney brain at the time, I couldn’t sparse what he was trying to tell his friends, you know.
Aside from that, aside from purely conservative/liberal things, the constitution is obviously also the product of the ‘majority’ culture in a wider sense; it’s ‘the rules’. The majority American culture obviously affects practically everybody, even most people outside the United States. And it’s not going anywhere; it’s not going to disappear into fairy dust, you know—even after white Americans are less than 50% of the country, the majority culture will still be here. White minorities have been the dominant group in various colonies and even ex-colonies, even if they’re a little less secure in the saddle than numerical majorities. (And the core culture has only changed slightly since the old days, as the very hopeless insecurity of most radicals pays a sort of testament to.) America has a constitution, and the majority aren’t going to toss it overboard all of a sudden, you know.
I’m not saying that people shouldn’t have to learn about slavery, you know. Slavery is real. Slavery and the constitution both matter, right. And they intersect. They’re part of the same story. But certainly the majority thinks in terms of ‘the rules’ as the normative thing, even when certain groups only exist at the margins of that story…. And I’m saying that even the perspective that puts the center at the center and the margins at the margins, even when that isn’t fair, has /some/ legitimacy, you know. All perspectives matter. I’m saying that no true change results from /gratuitously/ making the majority culture afraid or uncomfortable, you know—
(punk singer) The Constitution is gay! The Constitution is gay! (head banging) Okay! (starts doing sexual hand gestures during the drum solo)
America has a constitution….
And although I’m white—I’m not saying that (a) there’s a One True POV, and (b) it’s mine—even I often have to remember, being as weird or whatever as I am, that the majority culture also has a story, too….
But what are you gonna do. I remember Dr. Hew Len—the Hawaiian guy in the book ‘Zero Limits’—told people he had made an agreement with himself that if he ever got through a whole day—one, whole, day—without having a single judgmental thought—not even /one/, /thought/—he would eat so much ice cream that he’d practically have to get sick—but he could never get through a whole day.
And he’s a Hawaiian guru, you know.
…. All nations have a collective aspect, although the American nation is relatively individualist. I guess the debate about this is necessary today, because on the one hand totally ignoring the collective aspect usually just leaves in place the injustices created by our imperfect history of liberty, whereas on the other hand, an individualist country that agrees on less now than it used to obviously has a need for the private sphere as well.