Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros
Carregando... Deleuze: A Guide for the Perplexedde Claire Colebrook
Nenhum(a) Carregando...
Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
Pertence à série
Continuum's Guides for the Perplexed are clear, concise and accessible introductions to thinkers, writers and subjects that students and readers can find especially challenging. Concentrating specifically on what it is that makes the subject difficult to fathom, these books explain and explore key themes and ideas, guiding the reader towards a thorough understanding of demanding material. Gilles Deleuze is undoubtedly one of the seminal figures in modern Continental thought. However, his philosophy makes considerable demands on the student; his major works make for challenging reading and require engagement with some difficult concepts and complex systems of thought. Deleuze: A Guide for the Perplexed is the ideal text for anyone who needs to get to grips with Deleuzian thought, offering a thorough, yet approachable account of the central themes in his work: sense; univocity; intuition; singularity; difference. His ideas related to language, politics, ethics and consciousness are explored in detail and - most importantly - clarified. The book also locates Deleuze in the context of his philosophical influences and antecedents and highlights the implications of his ideas for a range of disciplines from politics to film theory. Throughout, close attention is paid to Deleuze's most influential publications, including the landmark texts The Logic of Sense and Difference and Repetition. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)
Google Books — Carregando... GênerosClassificação decimal de Dewey (CDD)194Philosophy and Psychology Modern western philosophy French philosophersClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing. |
So Claire Colebrook's contemplation of Deleuze (and let Guides for the Perplexed fool you not--this is a critical musing on his body of work, not an intro or summary) has a fair bit of interest for me and a fair bit else that makes me roll my eyes. Opening with a dabble, an extended discursion on Deleuze and Guattari's writing on cinema, is a mistake--the eye wilts and the mind turns away as we fret over the difference between ideas and concepts (which is not even uninteresting, just abstract, and which D&G explain far better themselves in the first chapter of What is Philosophy?). And even though it's going somewhere interesting--the power of art to be pure perception, without seer and seen, the Isherwood move, because "I am a camera" is so much different than simply saying "I am an eye", and Deleuze would appreciate the technologic of that--you can't stick around to watch art show us different ways to be than the way we already know how to be, because you are stultified, dawg.
The argument on capitalism and the reinvestment of capital leading to an endless recursive loop where we work not to live but because the logic of our life is in work/consumption, that is more interesting but also maybe more banal. I like its potential as a French take on the alienation of labour in a Marxian sense, and Zizek's injunction to enjoy. And it did give me the greatest short story about idea about a man who starts shitting money. But overall, the anti-capitalism of Anti-Oedipus as represented by Colebrook gets short shrift and shorter space.
And then more ontology, and then a discussion of affect, which is where Colebrook really shines--helping me get the significance of this buzzterm as presented by the Big Head of the theorist, and its relationship to the modern, the space for moving from nouns (the Self) to verbs (move, splash, colour, shift, see) that it affords, and the realization that the "shared aesthetic experience" I always invoke as the real reason people read or go to the pictures is eally something closer to a "shared affective experience", or should be if we want to make something useful of it. There is more in here, and ultimately even if it annoyed me it prepared me pretty well to go back to Deleuze and find more in him and let it swell and rhizome all over me. But ugh, leave brainology to the brainologists, Colebrook, not the brainosophers--and then summarize for us their brainological papers. ( )