Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros
Carregando... Valerie Solanas: The Defiant Life of the Woman Who Wrote SCUM (and Shot Andy Warhol) (2014)de Breanne Fahs
Carregando...
Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
Prêmios
The electrifying story of the woman who wrote SCUM Manifesto and shot Andy Warhol. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)
Google Books — Carregando... GênerosClassificação decimal de Dewey (CDD)305.42092Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology Groups of people Women Role in society, status History, geographic treatment, biography BiographyClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing. |
That's what this biography does an excellent job of illuminating, that there's much more to Solanas than the day she shot Andy Warhol (fifteen minutes of fame?). By focusing on Solanas' writing and her own interpretations of her work, Fahs shows that Solanas was a witty, complex, and progressive thinker who was defying norms far more than many of her more-famous 1960s contemporaries.
Fahs has a tremendous job in that she has to not just dispel the idea that all Solanas ever did was write a very strange tract and fire a gun; she also has had to search extremely patchy and scant resources to find the missing materials to fill in all the gaps. She succeeds, and what emerges is not a caricature of a man-hater but a moving picture of someone who spoke and wrote in ways that were so far advanced that people simply mistook (and continue to mistake) her often oblique meaning(s). As a critical biographer, Fahs excels at close readings of her subject and the words that remain on record, spoken and in text. She unravels the Solanas legend and spins a story that is far more complex than the circulating legends.
In fact, when she does fall short, it is when she tries to box Solanas in or pin her down as something in particular, even if it's something positive, like a particular kind of revolutionary thinker. It must be tempting to label your subject as being at the vanguard of X thinking or theory, but critical readings of Solanas' own work defy any such categorization (and Fahs' own thesis essentially contradicts this line of thinking).
Recommended for those interested in radical 60s feminism (or feminism in general), queer theory, things Factory-related, or women who will not put up and shut up. ( )