Página inicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquise No Site
Este site usa cookies para fornecer nossos serviços, melhorar o desempenho, para análises e (se não estiver conectado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing, você reconhece que leu e entendeu nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade . Seu uso do site e dos serviços está sujeito a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados do Google Livros

Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros

Carregando...

The Watchdog That Didn't Bark: The Financial Crisis and the Disappearance of Investigative Journalism (Columbia Journalism Review Books)

de Dean Starkman

MembrosResenhasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
312769,862 (4)2
In this sweeping, incisive post mortem, Dean Starkman exposes the critical shortcomings that softened coverage in the business press during the mortgage era and the years leading up to the financial collapse of 2008. He locates the roots of the problem in the origin of business news as a market messaging service for investors in the early twentieth century. This access-dependent strain of journalism was soon opposed by the grand, sweeping work of the muckrakers. Propelled by the innovations of Bernard Kilgore, the great postwar editor of the Wall Street Journal, these two genres merged when mainstream American news organizations institutionalized muckraking in the 1960's, creating a powerful guardian of the public interest. Yet as the mortgage era dawned, deep cultural and structural shifts-some unavoidable, some self-inflicted-eroded journalism's appetite for its role as watchdog. The result was a deafening silence about systemic corruption in the financial industry. Tragically, this silence grew only more profound as the mortgage madness reached its terrible apogee from 2004 through 2006. Starkman frames his analysis in a broad argument about journalism itself, dividing the profession into two competing approaches-access reporting and accountability reporting-which rely on entirely different sources and produce radically different representations of reality. As Starkman explains, access journalism came to dominate business reporting in the 1990's, a process he calls "CNBCization," and rather than examining risky, even corrupt, corporate behavior, mainstream reporters focused on profiling executives and informing investors. Starkman concludes with a critique of the digital-news ideology and corporate influence, which threaten to further undermine investigative reporting, and he shows how financial coverage, and journalism as a whole, can reclaim its bite.… (mais)
Nenhum(a)
Carregando...

Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Veja também 2 menções

Exibindo 2 de 2
The title is a misnomer. This is really a history of financial journalism, going back to Ida Tarbell and Standard Oil. There's not enough on the Financial Crisis of 2008. The lookback is fine, especially on muckraking, and if you're interested in the early days of the WSJ, Fortune, Forbes, BusinessWeek, and CNBC, it's all here. When the author gets down to brass balls, he's got his sword out for Jamie Dimon, Sandy Weill, and Eric Holder, and rightfully so. For a much clearer look at the massive mortgage fraud itself, read Chain of Title by David Dayen.

Quotes: "The Community Reinvestment act, mistakenly assigned blame by conservatives as a cause of the mortgage crisis."

"As regulation left the field, journalism did, too."

"The very nature of stories that frame issues in terms of risk to a particular facet of the financial system render them of limited use, because they fail to take into account the extent to which fraud played a role in undermining financial models. The view is top-down when the reporting needs to be from the bottom up."

"A reading of Wall Street profile stories shows them to be so deeply embedded in Wall Street values and expectations that they actually contributed to the atmosphere stoking predatory lending."

"Abandonment of muckraking and public-interest reporting left it dangerously detached from the realities of the subprime industry and the sweeping changes overtaking the financial system. Conventional business reporting did not grasp financial lawlessness on this scale."

"With federal regulators defanged, Congress compliant, the White House complicit, and a financial sector run amok, who was fighting for the public?"

"The press presented homeowners as being just as culpable for the housing bubble and fraud as the financial institutions that aggressively lent to them. Relatively few focused on why households took on so much debt in the first place."

"The Obama administration and its attorney general, Eric Holder, must bear primary responsibility for the inexplicable absence of a single criminal prosecution to be brought against any major figure either among mortgage lenders or on Wall Street. As we're learning, only an indictment has the power to change a narrative. Civil settlements won't do." ( )
  froxgirl | Oct 22, 2018 |
Another fine addition to the financial crisis bookcase (not shelf!). Starkman takes us all the way back to the early muckrakers and writes a glowing tribute to Ida Tarbell and her exposes on Standard Oil. His history of the Wall St Journal and of Dow and Jones and many other writers, editors, and personalities are well written.

Of the recent crisis, he faults most of the media for being asleep at the wheel and for ignoring the illegal and immoral mortgage boiler rooms, and for focusing on the CEOs instead of on their heinous ties to the sub prime bottom feeders. This is for the most part, he feels, caused by the collapse of print journalism at exactly the wrong time, and on the de-emphasis of the "long story". Now news is produced on a "hamster wheel" and designed to keep churning out food for the voracious on line outlets.

The best chapters deal with individual great reporting efforts by Susan Faludi (who knew???) and Michael Hudson. ( )
  froxgirl | Mar 25, 2014 |
Exibindo 2 de 2
sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
Você deve entrar para editar os dados de Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Compartilhado.
Título canônico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Lugares importantes
Eventos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Primeiras palavras
Citações
Últimas palavras
Aviso de desambiguação
Editores da Publicação
Autores Resenhistas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Idioma original
CDD/MDS canônico
LCC Canônico

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês

Nenhum(a)

In this sweeping, incisive post mortem, Dean Starkman exposes the critical shortcomings that softened coverage in the business press during the mortgage era and the years leading up to the financial collapse of 2008. He locates the roots of the problem in the origin of business news as a market messaging service for investors in the early twentieth century. This access-dependent strain of journalism was soon opposed by the grand, sweeping work of the muckrakers. Propelled by the innovations of Bernard Kilgore, the great postwar editor of the Wall Street Journal, these two genres merged when mainstream American news organizations institutionalized muckraking in the 1960's, creating a powerful guardian of the public interest. Yet as the mortgage era dawned, deep cultural and structural shifts-some unavoidable, some self-inflicted-eroded journalism's appetite for its role as watchdog. The result was a deafening silence about systemic corruption in the financial industry. Tragically, this silence grew only more profound as the mortgage madness reached its terrible apogee from 2004 through 2006. Starkman frames his analysis in a broad argument about journalism itself, dividing the profession into two competing approaches-access reporting and accountability reporting-which rely on entirely different sources and produce radically different representations of reality. As Starkman explains, access journalism came to dominate business reporting in the 1990's, a process he calls "CNBCization," and rather than examining risky, even corrupt, corporate behavior, mainstream reporters focused on profiling executives and informing investors. Starkman concludes with a critique of the digital-news ideology and corporate influence, which threaten to further undermine investigative reporting, and he shows how financial coverage, and journalism as a whole, can reclaim its bite.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo em haiku

Current Discussions

Nenhum(a)

Capas populares

Links rápidos

Avaliação

Média: (4)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 1
4.5
5

É você?

Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing.

 

Sobre | Contato | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blog | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Históricas | Os primeiros revisores | Conhecimento Comum | 204,489,762 livros! | Barra superior: Sempre visível