Página inicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquise No Site
Este site usa cookies para fornecer nossos serviços, melhorar o desempenho, para análises e (se não estiver conectado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing, você reconhece que leu e entendeu nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade . Seu uso do site e dos serviços está sujeito a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados do Google Livros

Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros

Carregando...

Purple Secret (1998)

de John C.G. Rohl, David Hunt, Martin Warren

MembrosResenhasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
751355,114 (3.88)6
First published in 1998, this is a study, based on DNA sequencing, that traces the porphyria stain through the genealogical maze of Europe's royal dynasties to the present day descendants of the Houses of Hanover and Windsor, and the consequences it might have had on the history of Europe and North America.… (mais)
Nenhum(a)
Carregando...

Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Veja também 6 menções

An account of the likely incidence of porphyria in European royal families. The authors are a historian (John C.G. Röhl) and two geneticists (Martin Warren and David Hunt); perhaps the book could have benefited from fewer authors but more editors. The issue of porphyria in royalty first came up with a 1966 paper in the British Medical Journal by Ida Macalpine and her son Richard Hunter, theorizing that the notorious “madness” of King George III that precipitated the Regency Crisis was porphyria. The theory has now so permeated historical consciousness that I never realized it was (and to a certain extent, still is) controversial; but at the time it most definitely was. The prevailing theory in 1966 was Freudian; George III was suffering from “sexual frustration” resulting in his rejection of Queen Charlotte and sexual attacks on Lady Pembroke (he couldn’t have been that frustrated, as he had 15 children with the Queen). The critics noted neither Macalpine or Hunter were experts on porphyria (they were both psychiatrists) and they weren’t proper Britishers (Macalpine had changed her name from Hirschmann in gratitude for refuge after her escape from Nazi Germany; the authors of Purple Secret mention her Jewishness several times, perhaps hinting that her critics were anti-Semitic). Critics also claimed George III’s reported symptoms were vague enough to be consistent with an assortment of diseases in addition to porphyria, and that if it was genetic porphyria half of his children should have had it as well.


Macalpine, Hunter and collaborator Claude Rimington attempted to answer the objections by tracking down the descendants of George III and asking them for stool and urine samples; they seemed genuinely surprised at the vehement negative responses they received. It was before the days of DNA analyses, and the genetics of porphyria hadn’t been worked out, so samples from an active case were the only way to make a positive diagnosis. The best they could do was claim that at least two people, disguised as “Patient A” and “Patient B”, had clinical signs of porphyria and were descendants of George III.


Unfortunately, the book bogs down at this point. Perhaps historian Röhl took over the writing; but what follows is page after page after page of medical records from various famous (Queen Victoria) and obscure (Princess Feodora) European royalty. While there’s an amazing amount of research involved – pages of doctor’s notes – it really doesn’t say very much. The problem is that the symptoms of porphyria are so varied that practically any complaint can be associated with it (headache, abdominal pains, constipation, “fragile” skin, light sensitivity, mental disorder, delirium, and neurological complaints). Even the sign generally considered definitive – red to purple urine – only occurs in active cases and can be caused by other illnesses – or even by eating beets. If anything, you could make the case that a lot of royalty suffered from overdoctoring and polypharmia – patients were dosed with laxatives, emetics, opiates, arsenic, antimony, brandy; prescribed diets (one princess was instructed to eat nothing but asparagus and mashed potatoes) and subjected to the dubious procedures popular at the time (bleeding, cupping, leeches and electric shocks) – often simultaneously. While some of the original complaints could well be porphyria, once the doctors got ahold of things it’s impossible to distinguish porphyria from reactions to the treatments. What the authors should have done first is provide a detailed explanation of porphyria rather than diving into the symptoms of dozens of European royals; I suspect the editors vetoed that as “too technical” and, unfortunately, it’s relegated to an appendix. Porphyria is caused by metabolic errors in the production of haem (which was originally called porphyrin, hence the name). However, the disease isn’t caused by haem deficiency, but by accumulation of byproducts from incorrect haem synthesis. Haem production is a seven-step process and can go wrong on any step; explaining the wide variety of “porphyria” symptoms and signs; each is caused by accumulation of different metabolites. The full sequence wasn’t worked out until 1995, long after the 1965 BMJ paper. (This might explain some of the criticisms of Macalpine and Hunter; many of the world’s porphyria cases occur in South Africa, where they can be traced back to the 1688 marriage of Gerrit Jansz to Ariaantje Jacobs. The South Africa doctors dismissed Macalpine and Hunter’s claim because George III’s symptoms were mostly different from those seen in South Africa. However, when it was shown that “porphyria” is a suite of conditions caused by different metabolic errors, one of the most prominent South African critics reversed his position and allowed that George III could have had one of the porphyria variants).


More or less definitive results do finally come, but are almost anticlimactic. Warren and Hunt obtain permission to sample the blood-stained shirt of Charles I and to exhume the bodies of two of Queen Victoria’s descendants – her granddaughter Princess Charlotte of Prussia and her great-granddaughter Princess Feodora. Unfortunately only one of these was a hit – Charles I’s shirt had been handled so many times that the evidence was equivocal and Princess Feodora’s grave in Poland had been robbed on several occasions and the scattered bones remaining didn’t seem to be hers. However, Princess Charlotte’s rest had been undisturbed until Warren and Hunt got to her; there was a water-damage hole in the coffin, they were able to get a fiber optics probe inside, and remotely grappled and extracted the Princess’s femur and a couple of finger bones. Amplification by PCR showed Princess Charlotte had a mutation that affected the gene that codes for protoporphyrinogen oxidase (which controls the transition from step 5 to step 6 in haem production). The princess’s medical records did show some porphyria symptoms; interestingly, one she shared with George III was a sort of sexual dementia; George III was notorious for making improper advances to Lady Pembroke during his mental episodes and Charlotte was notorious for doing the same with just about anybody.


Thus, despite a lot of interesting anecdotes about royal medical problems Purple Secret only slightly strengthens the case for porphyria in George III (George III was Princess Charlotte’s great-grand uncle). The definitive answer, of course, would involve getting DNA samples from some of the living royals and/or some of the other royal burials; the British royal family has never allowed anything of the sort (even, for example, to solve the “Princes in the Tower” mystery) and the authors of Purple Secret don’t even suggest it. ( )
1 vote setnahkt | Dec 16, 2017 |
sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha

» Adicionar outros autores

Nome do autorFunçãoTipo de autorObra?Status
John C.G. Rohlautor principaltodas as ediçõescalculado
Hunt, Davidautor principaltodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Warren, Martinautor principaltodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Você deve entrar para editar os dados de Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Compartilhado.
Título canônico
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Lugares importantes
Eventos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Primeiras palavras
Citações
Últimas palavras
Aviso de desambiguação
Editores da Publicação
Autores Resenhistas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Idioma original
CDD/MDS canônico
LCC Canônico

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês (3)

First published in 1998, this is a study, based on DNA sequencing, that traces the porphyria stain through the genealogical maze of Europe's royal dynasties to the present day descendants of the Houses of Hanover and Windsor, and the consequences it might have had on the history of Europe and North America.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo em haiku

Current Discussions

Nenhum(a)

Capas populares

Links rápidos

Avaliação

Média: (3.88)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 1
3.5 1
4 2
4.5 1
5 2

É você?

Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing.

 

Sobre | Contato | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blog | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Históricas | Os primeiros revisores | Conhecimento Comum | 204,452,234 livros! | Barra superior: Sempre visível