Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros
Carregando... A Dictionary of Construction, Surveying, and Civil Engineering (Oxford Paperback Reference)de Christopher Gorse
Nenhum(a) Carregando...
Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
Pertence à série publicada
An A to Z of construction, surveying, and civil engineering terms covering all core aspects, this book provides a one-stop reference for construction students and professionals. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)
Google Books — Carregando... GênerosClassificação decimal de Dewey (CDD)624.03Technology Engineering and allied operations Civil Engineering Dictionaries And EncyclopediasClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia: Sem avaliação.É você?Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing. |
engineering
by Christopher Gorse, David Johnston and Martin Pritchard.
Oxford University Press, 2012 978-0-19-953446-3 £12.99
This is part of the Oxford paper back reference series and deemed
on the cover to be for students and professionals. It lives up to its title and as all three authors are lecturers at Leeds Metropolitan University, one from each of the disciplines mentioned in the title, it can be expected to be suitable for use at undergraduate level.
Most professionals would not need it unless on the fringes of the
professions listed. Undergraduates in architecture and structural
engineering might well find it useful although there is little on the design side. Also included are many terms relating to the
environment and sustainability, with which all the built environment professionals are currently concerned.
Although the back cover states that it includes useful further
reading references I failed to find them. They are not within the text and there is no supplementary material before or after the
dictionary proper. In the same vein one should mention that the
‘many’ weblinks are few and far between and no websites are cited
in the traditional manner, e.g. www.abc.... Instead the entry may
say visit the website of xyz organisation. The actual site has either to be googled or located via the OUP site
www.oup.com/uk/reference/resources/construction which is given
on the back cover. This is not the most helpful approach.
Nowadays most dictionaries manage a little prefatory material or
essential data as appendices.
To consider the terms covered is difficult given the wide variation in requirement between a surveyor, whether building or quantity, and a civil engineer. Terms such as ‘error’ and ‘employer’ are more general than one would expect to find here. But ‘estoppel’ is well within the scope. While some definitions are lengthy, others are amazingly precise and not as informative as they could be. Many of the web links found take you to organisations concerned in that area. However as I continued to delve I found ‘elm’, but not oak,ash or beech, although oak was referred to comparatively from the
elm definition. Trying to get a little further into that I checked green oak, widely used in timber frame structures, to find ‘green timber’
but not oak.
This theme continued with some entries being surprising, such as
Murphy’s law. The first cross reference I checked was
unfortunately missing: ‘Recirculated hot water SEE Secondary
circulation’ (if you can find it – I could not!). The entry for ‘first angle’ refers you to ‘the technology students web site’, whatever that is. It sounds like an internal reference from a reading list which has not been edited out of the undergraduate version. The inclusion of ‘first floor’ is a bit naïve given that it gives the English definition without a mention that some countries call the ground floor the first floor (fairly logically it may seem to some). There are many more points which may be made. The entry for ‘contract’
does not lead you to the standard forms of contract of which ACA
and JCT are included but not NEC nor the BPF Property forms.
These are UK based as is the whole dictionary – to extend it would
be impractical but it should be stated where you are dealing with
topics governed by UK legislation and standards. The building
regulations do get a mention but a very slim one and no web link to their source on the planningportal. It is this type of detail which would have made it so much more useful to its potential users. An opportunity missed. Still for a relatively inexpensive volume it can achieve its basic aim for the undergraduate audience.
Valerie J Nurcombe
Winsford