Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros
Carregando... Marshall and His Generals: U.S. Army Commanders in World War IIde Stephen R. Taaffe
Nenhum(a) Carregando...
Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. I read, "Marshall and His Generals" as a compliment to my other military biographies I own. It was an interesting read. Each section of the book started with an overview of each of the major campaigns and theatres of operations of the war, then focused on the perspective of performance of and relationships between senior general (corps commanders and above) in those campaigns and theatres. There were 38 senior commanding generals reviewed in this book. Some were well known names. Other less so. Seeing how a major campaign unfolded and appreciating the roles of the senior generals in it was illuminating. While past performance and future potential were important considerations in wartime careers and promotions, the personalities of the generals themselves and those around and above them were also major factors in professional advancement. Stephen Taffe does a respectable job putting together the book. There are 65 pages of notes or references that, to me, indicates some comprehensive research. Other reviewers note Taffe sometimes expounds needlessly on gossipy details or personal opinions of various generals. Yes, I noted that. With the exception of a couple entries, it seemed relatively under control. I did think, however, that he spent a lot of time harping on the poor relationship between Eisenhower and Devers. Almost to a level of distraction. It is one thing to quote someone else's description of a general as a "prima dona". It is another for the author to use the descriptive term in dolling out his own judgments. Clearly the book focuses on senior American generals. How they were promoted, past and wartime performances, strengths and weaknesses. One thing that I think the author could have improved upon is identification of general officer ranks. 99% of the descriptions of the rank of each man just read, "General... ". Not the specific general rank such as Major General, Lieutenant General or General. I think that with regular full rank identification in the book, it would have enhanced the initial introduction of the general, better illustrated rank relations between generals during the war, and when they were promoted. Just calling all the men, "General" everywhere in the book grew confusing. Maybe the regular use of rank abbreviations might have been a good alternative (i.e. BG, MG, LTG). Less the above exceptions, overall this was an excellent book. I learned a lot about many generals. Prior to reading this book, I had perhaps only heard of various names in passing. I found it also indirectly provided some good additional understanding of the leadership, personalities and decisions of the war's primary US generals, Marshall, Eisenhower, MacArthur and Bradley. As I read this book, I had another book available to cross reference: Webster's American Military Biographies: The Stories of 1000 Military Figures. Webster's provided more complete biography profiles of generals and details of past rank promotions and assignments. Many (but not all) generals were found in Webster's. I look forward to additional biography reading with the leads provided in this book. Dr Taafe has produced a highly readable quick study of the US Army in WWI with thumbnail sketches and analyses of many of the US Army's general officers. The nine core chapters focus on particular campaigns taking the reader back and forth from the European and Pacific theaters. As each campaign unfolds in clear, understandable prose; the author examines the American leaders in quick, objective, analytic snapshots As usual with the Univ. Press of Kansas' series of Modern War Studies, a well done volume which I recommend. Goes well with Perrett's "There's a War to Be Won: The United States Army in World War II" and Millett & Murray's "A War To Be Won: Fighting the Second World War." I also recommend Taafe's "MacArthur's Jungle War." Please see my review of same. sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
Pertence à sérieModern War Studies (2011)
General George C. Marshall, chief of staff of the U.S. Army during World War II, faced the daunting task not only of overseeing two theaters of a global conflict but also of selecting the best generals to carry out American grand strategy. Marshall and His Generals is the first and only book to focus entirely on that selection process and the performances, both stellar and disappointing, that followed from it. Stephen Taaffe explores how and why Marshall selected the Army's commanders. Among Marshall's chief criteria were character (including "unselfish and devoted purpose"), education, (whether at West Point, Fort Leavenworth, or the Army War College), and striking a balance between experience and relative youth in a war that required both wisdom and great physical stamina. As the war unfolded, Marshall also factored into his calculations the combat leadership his generals demonstrated and the opinions of his theater commanders. Delving deeper than other studies, this path-breaking work produces a seamless analysis of Marshall's selection process of operational-level commanders. Taaffe also critiques the performance of these generals during the war and reveals the extent to which their actions served as stepping stones to advancement. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
Google Books — Carregando... GênerosClassificação decimal de Dewey (CDD)940.54History and Geography Europe Europe 1918- Military History Of World War IIClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing. |
If there is a particular revelation for me in this book it is that of the career of Jacob Devers, who eventually parleyed a staff slot in the backwater of Italy into command of the U.S. 6th Army Group; much to the annoyance of Eisenhower, Bradley and Patton. Besides demonstrating a certain mastery of bureaucratic politics, Devers' fine performance also brings into question just how essential some of the standard heroes of the U.S. war effort in ETO were; as they say, the graveyards are filled with indispensable men.
I have very little to mark this book down for, but two points come to mind. One is that it's not clear Taaffe really appreciates the concept of operational warfare, or at least he doesn't explicitly makes judgements of achievement on that basis. Two, Taaffe also doesn't spend much time talking about what a limited base that the U.S. Army had to draw from in terms of its field commanders, which would be part of the explanation of why some individuals who deserved relief, if only for health reasons, were allowed to remain in combat positions. Then again, Taaffe does remind readers of why this was less of a concern than it might be, as the U.S. Army was not depending on individual virtuosity on the field of battle to win the war. ( )