Página inicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquise No Site
Este site usa cookies para fornecer nossos serviços, melhorar o desempenho, para análises e (se não estiver conectado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing, você reconhece que leu e entendeu nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade . Seu uso do site e dos serviços está sujeito a essas políticas e termos.
Hide this

Resultados do Google Livros

Clique em uma foto para ir ao Google Livros

The Magic of Reality: How we know what's…
Carregando...

The Magic of Reality: How we know what's really true (original: 2011; edição: 2012)

de Richard Dawkins (Autor)

MembrosResenhasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
1,593358,548 (4.01)32
The author of "The God delusion" addresses key scientific questions previously explained by rich mythologies, from the evolution of the first humans and the life cycle of stars to the principles of a rainbow and the origins of the universe.
Membro:rhi.cu
Título:The Magic of Reality: How we know what's really true
Autores:Richard Dawkins (Autor)
Informação:Black Swan (2012), Edition: First Thus, 272 pages
Coleções:Sua biblioteca, Para ler
Avaliação:
Etiquetas:Nenhum(a)

Detalhes da Obra

The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True de Richard Dawkins (2011)

  1. 00
    A Little History of Science de William Bynum (themulhern)
    themulhern: Both books are science books directed at a younger audience. While "A Little History of Science" is mostly descriptive, "The Magic of Reality" is persuasive, and hence more intellectually demanding. It is true that "The Magic of Reality" is not going to convert the anti-scientific, but it's going to help the scientific understand why they have reason to believe the things they do, which as John Stuart Mill pointed out in "On Liberty" is a very valuable sort of knowledge. So, I'ld say that "The Magic of Reality" is the stronger book, but "A Little History of Science" has more facts and history, and is therefore useful in that way.… (mais)
  2. 00
    Astrophysics for Young People in a Hurry de Neil deGrasse Tyson (themulhern)
    themulhern: Two famous authors of popular science try writing for children. Dawkins is much better, however, he never seems to be dumbing it down and he doesn't make the dumb jokes.
  3. 00
    Newton at the Center de Joy Hakim (themulhern)
    themulhern: Both books are about the process of science as well as the facts of science. Both are written for young adults but readily appreciated by fully mature adults.
Carregando...

Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Veja também 32 menções

Mostrando 1-5 de 35 (seguinte | mostrar todas)
I think "The Magic of Reality", by Richard Dawkins, may have been written as a "Young Adult" or "Y.A." book for inquisitive minds, but it works just as well for adult readers. Dawkins discusses a number of common themes regarding our solar system, our world, ancient myths, evolution, and life on earth. I guess that would place the book in the category of a science book, but Dawkins knows how to provide just enough detail to make things clear without getting technical. Too few students seem to take a fully array of science classes, and "The Magic of Reality" might just whet some appetites for further exploration of the subject. For the adult reader who is familiar with the scientific concepts he discusses, it also makes for a nice review and refresher of these concepts.

( )
  rsutto22 | Jul 15, 2021 |
My favorite part of this book would have to be the artwork, which is as varied as it is creative and beautiful. The illustrator Dave McKean is probably better known as the director of MirrorMask and the main illustrator for Neil Gaiman. Honestly at times the prose felt dry in comparison to the visuals accompanying it. I felt like Richard Dawkins was a bit stiff in parts, like he was trying to fit his writing to his perceived young audience and wasn't sure how to address them. Other times he was passionate and natural so I think that the missteps aren't dealbreakers. His section on evolution was particularly enjoyable and lively. I definitely would recommend this to a science-oriented child. ( )
  jobinsonlis | May 11, 2021 |
While I really liked the idea driving this book, that science provides a sort of magic with their explanations of natural phenomonia, I didn't feel that he followed throught well enough. Be warned, he is a scientist and an athiest. Not that those two are mutually exclusive, I felt that his need to bash religion overshadowed the idea that the reasons behind scientific happening can been seen as miraculous and wonderous in their own right. That being said, I thought his explanations of said happening to be really helpful. ( )
  Colleen5096 | Oct 29, 2020 |
To be sure, I need to be clear as to WHY I like this book. It's not like any of the science or reasoning in it is new or unusual, or that I haven't heard many similar reasonings here or there all the way from high school physics courses all the way to certain and strange movies I've enjoyed.

Why I do love this book is simple: it's clear, concise, and it does a very admirable job of setting up magical thinking in all its flavors against the fundamentals of science.

It's a great primer. I think I would have loved reading this when I was 13 or 14. It might have even sparked my interest in science even more than I had been sparked... but that might not be possible. Science Fiction did a perfectly admirable job in that department, with Heinlein and Asimov as my tutors.

Even so, apart from the things I've heard about of Dawkins, this is relatively mild in the religion bashing. He uses logic and reasoning, postulating clearly and setting up the universe as it is, not as we wish it would be. He also makes sure that Occam's Razor is quite sharp.

I certainly have no complaints about this book, assuming I wanted a basic primer, of course.

As for being an adult reading this? It's charming. It's somewhat magical in the sense that I draw a sense of wonder about the universe and our living within it. For that alone I would recommend it as a bit of light reading, assuming you're up to your science snuff. :) ( )
  bradleyhorner | Jun 1, 2020 |
I would never have expected to have put one of Dawkins' books into my 'unfinished' collection, but I really have no intention of finishing this one. I didn't appreciate when I bought it that it was for children and YA, which in fiction wouldn't be problem for me but I find Dawkins' style here hideously patronising to the extent that I couldn't put up with it any longer. The early parts of the book are also pretty much a rehash of The Ancestor's Tale, which I thoroughly enjoyed a few years ago, but dumbed down for half wits. Pity. ( )
  Only2rs | May 10, 2020 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 35 (seguinte | mostrar todas)
as Richard Dawkins confirms again and again in this book – his first for "a family audience" – science composes stories as thrilling as Homer, as profound as Job, and as entertaining as anything by Kipling.
adicionado por mikeg2 | editarThe Guardian, Tim Radford (Sep 21, 2011)
 

» Adicionar outros autores

Nome do autorFunçãoTipo de autorObra?Status
Richard Dawkinsautor principaltodas as ediçõescalculado
McKean, DaveIlustradorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Você deve entrar para editar os dados de Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Compartilhado.
Título canônico
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Lugares importantes
Eventos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Premiações
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em Russo. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Clinton John Dawkins
1915-2010
O, my beloved father
Primeiras palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Reality is everything that exists.
Citações
Últimas palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Aviso de desambiguação
Editores da Publicação
Autores Resenhistas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Idioma original
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
CDD/MDS canônico
Canonical LCC

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês (3)

The author of "The God delusion" addresses key scientific questions previously explained by rich mythologies, from the evolution of the first humans and the life cycle of stars to the principles of a rainbow and the origins of the universe.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo em haiku

Capas populares

Links rápidos

Gêneros

Melvil Decimal System (DDC)

501 — Natural sciences and mathematics General Science Philosophy and theory

Classificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos E.U.A. (LCC)

Avaliação

Média: (4.01)
0.5
1 4
1.5
2 6
2.5 1
3 36
3.5 20
4 104
4.5 8
5 70

É você?

Torne-se um autor do LibraryThing.

 

Sobre | Contato | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blog | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Históricas | Os primeiros revisores | Conhecimento Comum | 163,433,210 livros! | Barra superior: Sempre visível