End the University as We Know It
Entre no LibraryThing para poder publicar.
Este tópico está presentemente marcado como "inativo" —a última mensagem tem mais de 90 dias. Reative o tópico publicando uma resposta.
This editorial from the NYTimes a week ago caused a bit of a stir amongst the professors and grad students around me. What do you think?
Personally, although it raises a few concerns that need to be addressed (e.g. the ratio of graduate enrollments to available positions) much of the solution seems pretty absurd. The idea of top-down management of fields and positions (implicit in the article, though not spelled out fully) is particularly worrisome.
The article makes a terrible assumption in the first paragraph--that all grad students "pay" for their education. Wrong. Many programs offer teaching and research assistantships (for 5 years guaranteed here), so we pay ~$300 a semester in fees while making a very modest living. It talks about stipends later, but then says no benefits. I have excellent health care. A friend had a baby basically for free, while another racked up 15k in doctor's bills (don't ask). We're no good to them sick or dead, after all. I'm having a hard time taking this seriously at all, since he seems ignorant of the whole process.
I'll agree that there are too many people, too few jobs. I'm graduating like.. next week and there are little to no job prospects for me, despite being in a highly applicable field (chemistry, not religion or whatever the writer was). We could use some help on that front. My PhD, instead of a masters, is going to hold me back in some ways I think. -.-