Spam reporting thread #71

É uma continuação do tópico Spam reporting thread #70.

Este tópico foi continuado por Spam reporting thread #72.

DiscussãoSpam Fighters!

Entre no LibraryThing para poder publicar.

Spam reporting thread #71

Abr 22, 2020, 9:04 am


Distinguish between the following, and flag the highest level of the violation:

-- Type 1: Irredeemable commercial spam: make sure to flag the member's profile, as well as the spammy activity. This type includes things selling strollers, pharmaceuticals, live-streaming sports games, porn, and/or trying to create traffic/links to sites for such things. Sufficient profile flags will automatically result in temporary suspension and deletion of the member's activity, so use your profile-flagging powers wisely and carefully.

-- Type 2: Teachable moments: DO NOT flag the member's profile, but DO flag the violating activity (e.g. self-promotional Talk post, group, or local venue). This type includes promotional activity that violates the Terms of Service (TOS), but where the member is potentially redeemable, e.g. overzealous authors, overzealous publishers, or other members with small TOS violations but who are otherwise using the site legitimately. These cases should be reported to staff (by sending a message or email to staff and/or or posting on this thread), so the member can be taught how to use the site.

Specific procedures:
-- Overzealous authors or publishers (these fall under type 2): do NOT flag the member's profile. Report to staff here or privately. You can also send the member a polite message pointing them to the terms, mentioning the "no promoting" language, and pointing them to the Do's and Don't page for authors:
-- Suspected sock-puppetry to promote a book, write fake reviews, and/or stack ratings: do not flag the profile, but report to staff here or by message, so staff can investigate. This is a serious violation for which members can be permanently banned.
-- Profile flags for commercial spammers only (type 1): On the member's profile page, click on the "report for spam" link, then follow instructions to flag the member. Again, this is only for commercial spam, not for "overzealous" authors, publishers, or booksellers, which should be reported to staff instead. See Talk post:
-- Spam or promotional posts in a Talk topic (type 1 or 2): flag the post as an abuse of the terms of service.
-- Spam or promotional groups (types 1 and 2): flag new groups using the "flag this group" link.
-- Spam lists: report in this thread, and flag the member if it's commercial spam.
-- Spam works (type 1 spam): flag the work as spam on the work's editions page, and then vote on proposed work spam. Make sure to read the guidelines before proposing or voting, especially for what is not spam. Voting page:
-- Spam in a review (type 1), or an explicitly promotional review (type 2): flag the review as an abuse of the TOS, using the red flag.
-- Spam or promotion in "published reviews," or other CK fields (type 1 or 2): post here and/or delete.
-- Spam or egregious promotion/advertising in venues or events (type 1 or 2): post here and/or delete. Note that authors are permitted to add events for their books.
-- Spam in book links / quick links: post here and/or edit to remove spam.
-- Spam author names listed on a work: No current procedure. Tim has asked us not to change CK to indicate spammers, and not to combine spam authors together.
-- Not sure if it's spam? Post here, and explain why.

Please note that Tim has asked us not to use either CK or the combining system (whether works or authors) for spam fighting.

For more information see these wiki pages:
Procedures for flagging and reporting spam:
Spam works, guidelines for flagging and voting:

(A copy of these guidelines, for pasting in new threads, can be found here or at the top of previous threads.)

Editado: Abr 22, 2020, 10:47 am
Enthusiastic Author.

It looks like he asked for help, was given it by lilithcat, then proceeded to post the two links above anyway...
(Already left a comment)

Editado: Abr 23, 2020, 2:31 pm

Standard garbage. Please flag both topic and profile.

ETA: Man, that was fast. Profile suspended, topic gone. Thanks, magic fingers, wherever you are. :-}

Abr 23, 2020, 2:30 pm

Abr 24, 2020, 3:10 pm

Oh, look! I think I'll pretend to ask a question and somehow make it all about me and my book:

Abr 25, 2020, 11:49 am


Her choice of groups is interesting. '1001 Books to read before you die' This is such a great book, it should be on that list!

Abr 25, 2020, 12:18 pm

Editado: Abr 25, 2020, 12:45 pm

Writing a review of your own book is not flaggable.

Sorry she has just put in someone else's review. That is flaggable.

Abr 28, 2020, 11:29 pm

Snagged in the spam filters but not yet in oblivion. (Two topics snagged in six weeks means I'm not the only one who's probably checking the filters less often. So spammers work from offices?)

Abr 29, 2020, 3:06 am

>11 karenb: Gone now.

Abr 30, 2020, 2:09 pm

>14 Taphophile13: no posts? No group? That seems rather … benign of a profile. I'd leave it alone until they did something more blatant

Abr 30, 2020, 2:54 pm

>14 Taphophile13: I flagged it. I'm surprised it's still around.

Maio 3, 2020, 2:17 pm

>17 lilithcat: I think you mean group, not book.

In last line I would say probable not possible.

Maio 3, 2020, 3:31 pm

>18 MarthaJeanne:

Quite right! I'll edit that.

Maio 3, 2020, 4:49 pm

So flag all of them?

Maio 4, 2020, 7:18 am

Slow to knock them down this morning. This one posts multiple spam

Maio 4, 2020, 11:27 am

>21 2wonderY: gone now.

Maio 5, 2020, 1:45 pm

I guess this counts as an author.(

Maio 5, 2020, 1:47 pm

>23 MarthaJeanne: She has added a second message to the topic.

Maio 5, 2020, 6:28 pm

>23 MarthaJeanne: She's been around since 2009. And NOW she's doing this advertising thing? I wonder if her account got hacked...

Editado: Maio 5, 2020, 8:22 pm

>23 MarthaJeanne: Now she has started a group about her YouTube channel.

Maio 6, 2020, 3:09 pm

Maio 10, 2020, 5:26 pm

>35 Taphophile13: He seems to have responded to your message, but can't do that properly either. See his profile.

Maio 10, 2020, 5:46 pm

>36 MarthaJeanne: Thanks for your clear, polite reply to him. I don't deal well with "But I want to do things my way" responses.

Editado: Maio 10, 2020, 6:06 pm

>37 Taphophile13: I checked his Amazon page and discovered that "It is a highly intelligently written story." Apparently he has been done wrong by all sorts of people, and the books are his story.

Editado: Maio 10, 2020, 6:19 pm

>35 Taphophile13: If he is so intelligent, why hasn't he figured this out from the links we gave him?

Maio 10, 2020, 6:38 pm

>39 MarthaJeanne: Wow. It has been my experience that people who rely on telling you their IQ do so because they can't impress you any other way.

Editado: Maio 10, 2020, 6:54 pm

They can't impress me that way either. In fact I am more impressed with someone with a low IQ who acts intelligently than with someone with a high IQ who can't read a few web pages and figure out how to do what they explain. For some reason I am reminded of A Fish Called Wanda.

Maio 10, 2020, 8:17 pm

I expect he's a very stable genius. Probably even had an uncle who taught at MIT.

Maio 11, 2020, 1:58 am

Maio 12, 2020, 9:06 am

>44 karenb: The works still need flags, but the profiles are gone.

Editado: Maio 17, 2020, 9:15 am is an author who was warned about spam in August. His current messages seem to be trying how near he can get.

(His library consists only of his own books. However someone else has entered one of his books. His books have 5 star ratings, but the other member has not rated her copy.)

Maio 17, 2020, 10:52 am

The second one yes, first one no.
That's just a foolish request to try to write ti trends, which doesn't work.

Maio 17, 2020, 10:54 am

>48 gilroy: I agree with you, and even thought to write a response in the thread, but then I thought "Eh, why bother?"

Maio 17, 2020, 10:11 pm

>50 2wonderY: I left a note for her.

Maio 17, 2020, 11:37 pm

New member offering review service:

Editado: Maio 18, 2020, 3:40 am

Editado: Maio 25, 2020, 5:12 am

Maio 27, 2020, 11:42 am

Author who read enough to make a giveaway, but either didn't see the bit about advertising or thought he could just follow his instincts, no matter what the rules are for everybody else.

Editado: Maio 27, 2020, 12:21 pm

>58 MarthaJeanne: He has edited his first message and added a second one.

He left a message on my profile:
"Thank you. What about facts is considered advertising? The giveaway is running, and talking about my own works is condemned, as advertising? OK."

The original message included several links to places where his book is available.

Editado: Maio 27, 2020, 3:49 pm

>59 MarthaJeanne: The second message in his posting needs one more flag, if someone is inclined. I note that he's also on Goodreads. Hopefully he'll go back there.

Maio 27, 2020, 4:32 pm

>60 Lyndatrue: The message is gone, but because there were two, the topic stays.

Maio 27, 2020, 5:05 pm

>59 MarthaJeanne: They always have some stupid argument that they weren't advertising. Even when it was obvious that was their intent.

Maio 28, 2020, 3:58 pm

The offender in >58 MarthaJeanne: has now glommed onto another author's spam post.

Editado: Maio 28, 2020, 4:19 pm

Maio 28, 2020, 4:24 pm

Maio 28, 2020, 9:34 pm

He was warned and continued to spam?
Isn't that profile flag time?

Maio 29, 2020, 2:30 am

'No idea, sorry.' isn't spam, just WHY? when the last message was from July 31, 2009.

Jun 2, 2020, 6:13 am

>69 lilithcat: I'm going to drop him another comment that isn't a link back to his profile... :)

Jun 2, 2020, 7:12 am

>69 lilithcat: Notable self-promotional copy. I'm kinda glad it's preserved for posterity:

"I know many notable figures that say they are now notable figures due to their reading of the book Rocket Randy."

Jun 2, 2020, 7:28 am

I find his two paragraphs to be too much to read. Don't think I could manage a book, especially no one as complicated as he makes his out to be.

Jun 2, 2020, 10:06 am

>71 2wonderY:

I'd love to know how that's possible, as his book hasn't been released yet! I wonder who they are?

Jun 2, 2020, 1:51 pm

Honestly, the posts read like some serious trolling...

Jun 3, 2020, 7:42 am

Jun 9, 2020, 7:07 am
Enthusiastic Author
(Profile. Do not flag. Already commented)

Jun 10, 2020, 3:19 pm

>78 Taphophile13:

Definitely cheeky!

Jun 10, 2020, 3:23 pm

>79 lilithcat: Yes. And I don't bare anything with strangers. Hope he has a good editor.

Jun 12, 2020, 5:34 am

I’m curious why people are voting No and Undecided on those Spam works.

Jun 12, 2020, 6:13 am

>81 Taphophile13: The last one still needs votes.

Jun 12, 2020, 9:12 am

>82 2wonderY:

There could well be a legitimate work titled "Perth". Perth

Jun 12, 2020, 10:24 am

But the description included a link to the Spam business.

Jun 12, 2020, 10:38 am

>85 2wonderY:

Not everyone sees descriptions. Some folks (like me) have the feature set at "always hide".

Jun 12, 2020, 6:19 pm

It's not even description. It's in the Publication field

Jun 12, 2020, 7:45 pm

>85 2wonderY: It didn't when I looked at it. The dangers of deleting crap before it's been fully voted on?

Jun 17, 2020, 4:20 pm

>88 karenb: Spam work doesn't actually get deleted, you can still see it if you put the &spam=1 tag on the end of the URL:

Jun 18, 2020, 7:52 pm

Photographer created a group just to advertise his business (Not sure if I should give him the usual author promotion notice or flag him.)

Jun 18, 2020, 8:17 pm

>89 norabelle414: I meant deleting evidence of spamminess (e.g., the description) before the voting is done.

Jun 19, 2020, 6:13 am

Enthusiastic author advertising book: (Profile. Already commented, do not flag.)

Jun 19, 2020, 1:58 pm

>91 karenb: I can still see the spamminess when I click on that link. in the Book Information section there is a long paragraph that is copy/pasted from somewhere, and a link to their website. I don't think anything has been deleted.

Jun 20, 2020, 9:17 am

Dude's gone now, but I had to share!

Would you trust him to write your essays?

Brandon Curtis is the best expert and a senior content writer in the UK. No need to worry for the academic writing anymore you can take the writing service with him in cheap nursing essay writing service and have the best grades for the assignment waiting it is so much helpful for the students to have the good academic career in the UK.

Jun 20, 2020, 9:32 am

Wow! It is so much helpful for me to have him write my assignments!

Jun 20, 2020, 11:53 pm

>93 norabelle414: How the heck did I miss that? Geez.

Jun 21, 2020, 4:11 am

>95 MarthaJeanne: Reminded me of this t-shirt :-)

Editado: Jun 21, 2020, 8:02 am

New member has posted at least three adverts for his new book.

I've left a message on his profile

Will round up threads here, but most are already being flagged.

Editado: Jun 21, 2020, 9:13 am

>99 2wonderY: All three are gone now. (I was fourth on all of them. Love to see the topics disappear!)

I also divided the author page before he could complain that books were on his author page that he hadn't written.

Editado: Jun 26, 2020, 12:46 pm

Author spam. At least he realizes that it is a shameless plug.

The first one still needs a flag. Gone now.

Jun 26, 2020, 12:40 pm

Oddly, he spells the author name differently on his books, so they don't even land on the same author page.

Jun 26, 2020, 1:20 pm

>102 2wonderY:

He probably does that because they are two different genres. That's not terribly unusual, just as some authors use different names for different series.

Editado: Jun 26, 2020, 1:56 pm

Since he entered his copies yesterday and is the only member with these works, the two author pages aren't indexed for search yet. So we can't combine them yet.

Jun 28, 2020, 4:11 am

>101 MarthaJeanne: Response to my pm "Sorry. I'm new to the site. Not meaning to break the rules right off the bat. : )"

Of course he could have checked the rules, knowing that his ad was shameless. Oh, well.

While I'm thinking of it, I combined the author pages.

Jun 28, 2020, 9:18 am

>105 MarthaJeanne:

Authors not checking the rules seems to be the rule, rather than the exception.

Kind of like the folks who come here asking how they can read the books.

Jun 29, 2020, 9:55 am

Jul 4, 2020, 3:41 pm

An account created for an imposter site. The correct site is, and they are aware of the fake site.

Jul 4, 2020, 3:47 pm

Jul 4, 2020, 3:48 pm

>111 MarthaJeanne: Fast! And on a Saturday too.

Jul 9, 2020, 6:33 am

New group directs to his/her Facebook page

Jul 9, 2020, 8:43 am

Jul 9, 2020, 10:23 am

When did screwy uploads become spam? I'm seeing three items on the spam work list that are just bad uploads.
Also seeing one where someone was cataloging authors that got marked again...

Jul 9, 2020, 10:56 am

>115 gilroy:

Because people don't know what they're doing?

Jul 9, 2020, 1:46 pm

Keep an eye on this one:

It's not spam yet, but I expect it will be shortly. Why? Gee, maybe because the poster wrote a trilogy about Charlemagne? Any bets on how soon she recommends her own work?

Editado: Jul 14, 2020, 11:44 am

"Louis Lehot is positioned to provide tailored legal advice that is practical, commercial, and cost-effective for his clients. "


Editado: Jul 20, 2020, 2:43 am

Author spam

Note the rating and review.

I had a quick look at the book on Amazon. I don't think English is the author's first language.

Author's bio from Amazon:
"Writing is fun, engaging and the most beautiful thing to do. To pour out mental accumulations is such a wonderful thing, otherwise it makes a mess on the top. Happy reading"

Editado: Jul 22, 2020, 2:04 pm Member was warned about spam in 2015, and also earlier did not respect LT rules.

The review here is not by the author, but by someone else.

Editado: Jul 22, 2020, 1:52 pm

author offering review copies

long time member who was warned in 2015; left another note

MarthaJeanne beat me to it.

Jul 22, 2020, 2:05 pm

The topic is gone.

Editado: Jul 22, 2020, 2:26 pm

More author spam


She also knows better. 2012

Jul 22, 2020, 8:43 pm

Old talk messages that in a thread that was revived today, need just a few more flags to disappear.

Jul 24, 2020, 9:03 am

Editado: Jul 25, 2020, 10:21 am

>127 lilithcat: I deleted her member description and the published review (from Amazon) and flagged the review which was also copied from the amazon reviewer.

The topics still need flags. Update: only the fourth link still needs a flag. That one's gone, too.

Editado: Jul 27, 2020, 11:28 am

Profile gone, but this post remains:

ETA: Gone

Jul 27, 2020, 3:58 pm

Jul 28, 2020, 12:11 pm

>131 2wonderY: Both gone now.

Editado: Jul 31, 2020, 1:44 pm

This group seems to be set up for author spam.

ETA Sometimes authors react well to having the ToS pointed out to them.
"Thank you MarthaJeanne, the group is removed. Sorry!"
The member has also left LT.

Ago 7, 2020, 7:04 pm

Editado: Ago 9, 2020, 1:01 pm

Gone before I can finish the report.

Ago 9, 2020, 1:02 pm

>139 MarthaJeanne: Already gone.

Editado: Ago 10, 2020, 3:37 am

Author spam


Ago 10, 2020, 6:04 am

>141 MarthaJeanne: I feel like I've seen that profile once before. We're they warned already?

Editado: Ago 10, 2020, 9:15 am

They don't accept profile messages. I guess they don't like being told that they are advertising.

See >58 MarthaJeanne: ff They know darn well.

Unfortunately I don't go there often, so that message stayed up for several weeks.

Do you think it's time to flag?

Ago 10, 2020, 11:09 am

>143 MarthaJeanne: member flagging won’t make a difference. Reporting to Kristie is the only viable option.

Ago 10, 2020, 11:50 am

>144 2wonderY:

Member flagging can cause profiles to disappear, but such flagging should be restricted to commercial spam.

Authors fall into "Type 2", as indicated in >1 lilithcat:

Editado: Ago 10, 2020, 12:22 pm

>143 MarthaJeanne: >145 lilithcat: Well, this is their second time and they were warned once before. As far as I'm concerned, this is flag and notify Kristi, since they've turned off comments.

ETA: Wait, I could put a comment on the profile, so I have dropped my usual commentary of what is or is not proper.
If they erased the previous comment and blocked MarthaJeanne, that just tells me that they are due for flagging...

Ago 10, 2020, 12:22 pm

>143 MarthaJeanne: >146 gilroy:

I can see comments now. Maybe they changed that?

Ago 10, 2020, 12:52 pm

gilroy (#146):

We are explicitly forbidden from flagging "overenthusiastic" authors, no matter how many times they've been warned. Escalating by contacting Kristi directly is the appropriate response. (She prefers email but will respond to profile comments, so you don't need to resort to off-channel communications unless you want to.)

I see I have the member in question here blocked already. Probably because they maliciously edited a post to try to make me look stupid in an earlier thread about Member Giveaways (the "clarifying" text in the first post was absent when I responded):

Ago 10, 2020, 12:58 pm

I wonder if this person had been suspended at some point. His first post in the thread to which >148 lorax: links says, "my return to LT is appreciated."

I don't see comments either, but don't recall blocking him. He must have blocked me!

Ago 10, 2020, 1:12 pm

>148 lorax: Actually, if they've been warned and continue to advertise, we've been told we can flag. Especially if we've pointed them to the appropriate rules and TOS.

In this case, they look like they were flagged off prematurely the first time, allowed to return, then promptly proceeded to make an arse of themselves. I'm not flagging right now, because I couldn't see the warning from the previous time. I've dropped my reminder, in public, so it can be seen that they were warned. Then if he goes one more round, I'll flag.

Ago 10, 2020, 2:18 pm

As long as they have books cataloged, flagging does not suspend the account.

Ago 10, 2020, 2:23 pm

gilroy (#150):

Actually, if they've been warned and continue to advertise, we've been told we can flag. Especially if we've pointed them to the appropriate rules and TOS.

I missed that! Can you link me to it? I'm a a bit paranoid about flagging, given that they say getting it wrong is a violation of the TOS.

Ago 11, 2020, 12:24 am

Ago 11, 2020, 12:30 am

>153 2wonderY:

Definitely. I did flag it, earlier today, but it's still there!

Ago 11, 2020, 3:26 am

>153 2wonderY: The picture is definitely against the Terms of Service.

Ago 11, 2020, 7:26 am

>154 lilithcat: I've flagged the profile too.

Ago 11, 2020, 10:20 am

>153 2wonderY: Ye gods. No way is that picture within the ToS.

Ago 11, 2020, 11:00 am

I sent a note to Kristie.

Editado: Ago 12, 2020, 10:16 am

Profile take down is sluggish today. That was way too many posts. (17)

Ago 12, 2020, 10:24 am

>153 2wonderY:, >158 2wonderY: Profile is still there. Maybe bump it up to Tim?

Ago 12, 2020, 10:34 am

>161 Taphophile13:

Profile is gone.

Ago 12, 2020, 10:38 am

>162 lilithcat: I still see "Unconfirmed member." and the horrible picture.

Editado: Ago 12, 2020, 12:35 pm

Ago 12, 2020, 12:44 pm

>164 lilithcat:
I was referring to which is still present.

Ago 12, 2020, 1:57 pm

>161 Taphophile13: links to >153 2wonderY:, which is about lescort.

Editado: Ago 12, 2020, 3:13 pm

I thought I had seen a previous report suggesting that there was a bug that “unconfirmed” members could not be deleted with flagging, but I can’t find it.

Ago 12, 2020, 3:24 pm

There was a problem deleting accounts after LT went to all free (life-time) accounts. There was some discussion here:

Ago 12, 2020, 3:35 pm

>168 Taphophile13: He asked for input, so I have reopened it.

Ago 13, 2020, 10:54 am

Author spam


Ago 14, 2020, 11:25 am

Ago 14, 2020, 11:27 am

>171 Marissa_Doyle:

Could be. It's not spam - at least not yet.

Ago 14, 2020, 11:45 am
Author advertising her new audio version in a thread that mentions her book.


Ago 14, 2020, 3:53 pm

>173 MarthaJeanne: People are arguing against flagging the post.

Ago 14, 2020, 4:20 pm

>173 MarthaJeanne: I think I'd leave that one, especially since she didn't start the thread. She's not really advertising, just mentioning that there was a discussion about changing the cover for the recent audio version.

Ago 14, 2020, 5:38 pm

>176 amanda4242:

I'd leave it, too. The OP didn't merely "mention" her book, but actually used it as an example of how cover art affects the purchasing decision.

Ago 15, 2020, 9:36 am

And her library has more works cataloged than only hers alone. 😁

Ago 15, 2020, 10:00 am

Este utilizador foi removido como sendo spam.

Ago 15, 2020, 2:19 pm

>180 gilroy: message is gone. Profile isn't.

Ago 15, 2020, 2:30 pm

>180 gilroy:, >181 MarthaJeanne:

I wouldn't flag the profile. There are legit books catalogued

Ago 16, 2020, 11:46 am

Ago 17, 2020, 7:45 am

Enthusiastic author. Needs one more flag:

(Profile already noted)

Ago 20, 2020, 7:32 am

I've left a note. Review violates site rules and needs flagged aswell.

Ago 21, 2020, 6:02 pm

Author spam needs one more flag:

I've left a note on his profile:

Ago 21, 2020, 6:40 pm

>188 lilithcat: I suspect the author spam is gone, but the link in your post is for the Author Guidelines page...

Ago 21, 2020, 6:43 pm

so it is - screwed up "cut and paste".

Ago 22, 2020, 3:02 pm

>191 spiralsheep: If possible, could you post both profile and spam instance so we can make sure all are gotten at the same time, please?

Editado: Ago 22, 2020, 3:14 pm

>192 gilroy: Ok, thank you for the tip. After I posted I noticed several other comments by the same profile but they were all getting flagged by then.

Ago 22, 2020, 3:33 pm

Besides, for authors it's a good record for next time.

Editado: Ago 25, 2020, 4:48 am

>196 karenb: I don't understand why that spammer hasn't been suspended yet.

It at least looks like the messages are all gone.

Ago 25, 2020, 4:59 am

>197 MarthaJeanne: Me neither. I flagged it before posting, too.

Editado: Ago 25, 2020, 5:16 am

>198 karenb: I had flagged it before you posted. And lots of times spammers disappear before I can post here.

Anyway, the posts are gone. I had flashbacks to some of the really bad spam attacks from several years ago when I saw that block of topics.

Ago 25, 2020, 5:56 am

>196 karenb: is the profile to the author?

Editado: Ago 25, 2020, 7:48 am

>200 gilroy: The author of the spam topics, yes.

The comment on the profile is the same as/similar to the content of the spam topics.

ETA: Gone, finally.

Ago 25, 2020, 9:04 am

>197 MarthaJeanne:

I noticed a lag yesterday evening when I flagged a spam profile. A few hours after I did so, it was still there, but it's gone this morning. Usually, they disappear almost immediately.

Maybe related to The Mysterious Disappearance of Mr. Spalding?

Ago 25, 2020, 9:50 am

>201 karenb: No, I meant the author of the advertised book. That might be why it hadn't gotten enough flags to go.

Ago 25, 2020, 10:11 am

He did not seem to be the author, as the books he was selling were quite varied.

Ago 25, 2020, 10:24 am

Este utilizador foi removido como sendo spam.

Ago 25, 2020, 10:32 am

Thread is getting very long, so it is continued here:
Este tópico foi continuado por Spam reporting thread #72.