100 Books to Read in a Lifetime (That Are Older Than 200 Years)

Descrição
Amazon just released their "100 books to read in a lifetime." The oldest of which was published in 1813. That's a crying shame. Let's compile and vote on a list of the rest.
38
8,617 membros
67 resenhas
½ 4.3
Global Rank 37
39
7,318 membros
111 resenhas
3.8
Global Rank 43
38 Members
swhitco, JBD1, JeanLittleLibrary, benjfrank, smcwl, xenophon, southernbooklady, aulsmith, MusicalKnitter, WMGOATGRUFF, madpoet, Betelgeuse, toview, JCBest, th.lrnr, 2wonderY, anthonywillard, MaskedMumbler, LadyoftheLodge, BlueSkies305, Roberto823, dontcallmeleslie, TrulyAragorn, drmom62, pgleduc, writeslikeagirl, WriterWarrior, Turambar, susan01, cjmills, 21277008869595, PyrrhicVctry, Tom_Huckstep, dberndtd, JohnMB, Mapguy314, Newton_Books, Nicolebigelow3,TCBard , ,jaysonwm
Explicações
aulsmith: Silverbooks is correct, but I found it engaging. Of course, I was only 12 and never reread it, so I'm not sure how it would come off now.
: mostly propaganda
Turambar: True, Franklin does a good deal of propagandizing, but the book is a sparkling example of Enlightenment Plain Style as well as being one of our earliest examples of American Exceptionalism and a sort of Pragmatism. It doesn't matter if you agree with his views or not; it's undeniably significant.
41
221 membros
5 resenhas
½ 4.5
Global Rank 27
54 Members
szarka, karenb, swhitco, casvelyn, john257hopper, jillmwo, JeanLittleLibrary, LShelby, cpg, TCBard, rarm, janimar, xenophon, souci, southernbooklady, hvanloon, MusicalKnitter, amanda4242, Mirabelle, WMGOATGRUFF, madpoet, cemanuel, Betelgeuse, toview, th.lrnr, anthonywillard, psdavid, bw94612, LadyoftheLodge, HxBuff, BlueSkies305, TrulyAragorn, ShaneTierney, drmom62, pgleduc, writeslikeagirl, ahef1963, mattries37315, WriterWarrior, raperper, Bookkat33, Turambar, Dr.Vickie, jeffza, cjmills, PyrrhicVctry, Tom_Huckstep, DelightedLibrarian, dberndtd, lfriedla, JohnMB, Mapguy314, marcelacaav, itstheblob,lorax , , ,yarb , ,aulsmith , , ,walthoff ,
Explicações
lorax : Thumbing down just to counteract psdavid's proselytizing. I think parts are worth reading for basic cultural literacy, but nobody likes being preached at in a forum like this.
aulsmith : Again, parts of it. But the whole thing? Knowing some of it was done from unreliable manuscripts? Nah.
psdavid: A book in two parts, the old testament which is the new testament hidden and the new testament which is the old testament revealed. Every one of the 66 books (39 Old testament and 27 new testament) interlinks and joins with every other, written in original languages by 40+ authors spanning 2,000 years and many cultures. A book that attracts lively debate as to authenticity and yet every day sees more of its writings and dates confirmed by archaeological finds.
: Why not read one of the better translations, if you're going to read the whole wretched Bible in the first place?
49
7,084 membros
52 resenhas
3.9
Global Rank 63
30 Members
lorax, szarka, Rtrace, MTL, smcwl, xenophon, southernbooklady, Nicole_VanK, MusicalKnitter, WMGOATGRUFF, madpoet, cemanuel, Betelgeuse, toview, perpender, BlueSkies305, dontcallmeleslie, TrulyAragorn, JoLynnsbooks, WriterWarrior, Turambar, Dr.Vickie, cjmills, PyrrhicVctry, dberndtd, mspixieears, JohnMB, Belarmino, Newton_Books, jaysonwm,karenb ,camainc , ,jeffza
Explicações
karenb : Taking Chretien de Troyes instead.
camainc : A better choice would be Idylls of the King by Tennyson.
: boring and more white dudes
Betelgeuse: Idylls of the King is too recent: published between 1859-1885.
56
23,066 membros
252 resenhas
3.8
Global Rank 32
58
3,223 membros
41 resenhas
½ 4.3
Global Rank 36
39 Members
timspalding, swhitco, henkl, benjfrank, yarb, smcwl, xenophon, southernbooklady, hvanloon, andejons, MusicalKnitter, WMGOATGRUFF, madpoet, Betelgeuse, toview, th.lrnr, MaskedMumbler, bw94612, BlueSkies305, Roberto823, dontcallmeleslie, ShaneTierney, drmom62, pgleduc, mattries37315, WriterWarrior, Turambar, 21277008869595, PyrrhicVctry, Tom_Huckstep, dberndtd, Mapguy314, Newton_Books, Nicolebigelow3, chas69, JacobKirckman, NinaHer, marcelacaav, praveen.jay80,camainc ,
Explicações
camainc : One only needs to read Augustine's City of God to know that Gibbon was so very wrong about the reasons for Rome's "decline and fall."
Turambar: Whether Gibbon was wrong or not is irrelevant to whether The Decline and Fall ought to be read. We don't read Herodotus because he was right. We read him because he helped shape how a civilization thought, as did Gibbon in his own, later way.
JacobKirckman: Gibbon's not 'on my list', as I have it (just not catalogued on LT yet)! Commenting purely to counter Camainc's claim that Gibbon was wrong. I'd take an historian (even an 18th century one) over a Bible-Basher any day...
64
2,389 membros
22 resenhas
3.9
Global Rank 97
68
2,680 membros
26 resenhas
4.1
Global Rank 95
73
5,056 membros
72 resenhas
½ 3.7
Global Rank 70
75
812 membros
16 resenhas
½ 3.3
Global Rank 114
77
2,036 membros
16 resenhas
½ 3.6
Global Rank 112
78
1,054 membros
7 resenhas
4.2
Global Rank 104
79
3,422 membros
20 resenhas
4
Global Rank 102
80
1,422 membros
12 resenhas
3.9
Global Rank 94
81
2,109 membros
21 resenhas
3.8
Global Rank 117
82
de Ovid
1,649 membros
33 resenhas
3.8
Global Rank 126
94
445 membros
7 resenhas
½ 3.7
Global Rank 108
16 Members
timspalding, benjfrank, Helcura, smcwl, xenophon, southernbooklady, MusicalKnitter, madpoet, Betelgeuse, PietWester, dontcallmeleslie, al.vick, stunes, WriterWarrior, PyrrhicVctry, dberndtd,Edward ,lorax
Explicações
lorax : I really don't think everyone needs to read a book that's been called "the book nobody read" (see http://www.librarything.com/work/16335 ). I have a PhD in astronomy and even I never read this; it's important to know about it, and why it was important, but actually reading it? Reading the old, old primary sources isn't important in science the way it is in history.
95
256 membros
3.8
Global Rank 178
96
2,736 membros
41 resenhas
4.1
Global Rank 113
97
357 membros
3 resenhas
3.8
Global Rank 165
98
323 membros
3 resenhas
3.8
Global Rank 111