Foto do autor
4 Works 197 Membros 6 Reviews

Obras de Steve Salerno

Deadly Blessing (1987) 27 cópias
The Book of Sex (2002) 3 cópias
Tns: The Newest Profession (1985) 2 cópias

Etiquetado

Conhecimento Comum

Sexo
male

Membros

Resenhas

This books fits my confirmation bias. Yes, I have one…evolved, matured, earned, and obviously acknowledged. I laugh at the old bookstore joke “Q: Can you direct me to the self-help section? A: If I told you, that would defeat the purpose.” Sharks hawking books, silly seminars (oops…that bias again), videos… yeah, no thanks. Really, … no thanks. Published in 2005, the message is still relevant. Probably even more so, given the explosion of “social” media in the intervening years since. Salerno has a dire warning: “To describe SHAM as a waste of time and money vastly understates its collateral damage.” He has the pedigree, and the experience, and the inside track - he shares that when working at Rodale “Another important lesson in self-help theology: SHAM’s answer when its methods fail? You need more of it. You always need more of it.”

The history is longer than we think:
In fact, by 1983, so substantial were sales figures for books of this genre that the lofty New York Times Book Review, which for decades fought the good fight on behalf of books written by actual writers, threw in the towel and added another category, “Advice Books,” to its distinguished best-seller list.


Then there’s this astute anecdote
Archie Brodsky, a senior research associate for the Program in Psychiatry and the Law at Harvard Medical School. “Psychotherapy has a chancy success rate even in a one-on-one setting over a period of years,” observes Brodsky, who coauthored (with Stanton Peele) Love and Addiction. “How can you expect to break a lifetime of bad behavioral habits through a couple of banquet-hall seminars or by sitting down with some book?
Chancy. Yep, fits my bias. And we’re not even out of the Introduction. Anyway…Salerno rightly observes SHAM “is a religion whose clerics get very, very rich by stating the obvious in a laughably pontifical fashion.” Sound like I’m grousing because I didn’t think of any of these scams, um, SHAMs, um… No, my ethics don’t allow me to prey on the gullible. Not so with all of the SHAMs Salerno exposes here…Dr. Phil, Dr. Laura, Dr. John Gray (who apparently got his paper from a degree mill), Suze Orman, to name a few… whose hypocrisies have no shame. The Tony Robbinses, sports figures and the plethora of saccharine nonsense that they and the media spout (I may have paraphrased that a bit…), life coaches, motivational speakers, and then there’s the Recovery business (“As you can see, they’re big on toxicity in Recovery circles. And they’re huge on shame; thousands of self-help books have focused directly on the concept.”)… preying even more.
In sum, Victimization and Recovery have relentlessly encouraged ordinary people with ordinary lives to conceive of themselves as victims of some lifelong ailment that, even during the best of times, lurks just beneath the surface, waiting to undo them.
Don’t think Salerno is minimizing actual victims…that’s a mistake. He’s calling out the snake oil peddlers who are manufacturing their target audiences.

On Robbins, a minor dig, but it punctuates the point that he’s really a serious SHAM
For someone whose stock in trade is the precise, life-changing use of language, Robbins can be surprisingly careless with it. Promotional materials describing his new line of nutritional products twice refer to one of the key ingredients as collodials instead of colloidals.
And then there are the psychics and pseudoscience health quack. Some are semi-savvy … on Silvia Browne’s Larry King show appearance: “Undeterred by her lack of any formal credentials except a master’s degree in English literature, Browne used medical terminology freely, and sometimes even correctly.” Most are dangerous.

It’s still a huge industry 16 years later, with dragon moms, and minimalists, and feng shui, jeez, look at even the artisanal waters out there… I know I’m not their target audience because I am so rarely as to be considered not influenced by advertisements. But they have a lot of targets who shell out a lot of money. One problem is
…what mostly distinguish[ed] self-help gurus from laypeople is the former group’s ability to “write well enough to get a book deal.” The Internet eliminates even that “credential,” modest as it is, thus further lowering the bar. It allows people who couldn’t get a book deal to direct-market their self-published (or, increasingly, e-published) wares and become viable niche players in the burgeoning relationships market.
(Not just SHAM books… pretty much anything)

One incredibly lucrative SHAM that Salerno doesn’t talk about is the televangelists (but he does talk about faith healing). That's probably a whole other book.
… (mais)
 
Marcado
Razinha | outras 5 resenhas | Sep 4, 2021 |
Interesting 2005 expose of the self-help industry. Featured are such well-known gurus as: Dr. Phil McGraw, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, Tony Robbins, Joel Osten and Oprah Winfrey. The SHAM of the title stands for: Self-Help and Actualization Movement. If buying and reading the books of the movement, listening to the radio and television programs, attending the seminars is so beneficial why does the Armerican public need to buy into the movement year after year. Won't at least some of us eventually turnout to be OK?… (mais)
 
Marcado
MrDickie | outras 5 resenhas | Oct 14, 2019 |
Didn't finish the book as I found it to be tedious and flimsy. The author seemed to pride himself in using big words to tell the story, which would have been better told in narrative form ala Gladwell. I was hoping for more substance, but simply found the kind of boring investigative journalism common to the daily news. Nothing was enlightening or enriching.
 
Marcado
garysmeade | outras 5 resenhas | Jul 17, 2014 |

Listas

You May Also Like

Estatísticas

Obras
4
Membros
197
Popularidade
#111,410
Avaliação
½ 3.4
Resenhas
6
ISBNs
12

Tabelas & Gráficos