Picture of author.

Nick Clegg

Autor(a) de Politics: Between the Extremes

5+ Works 110 Membros 3 Reviews

About the Author

Image credit: Nick Clegg. Photo by Alex Folkes/Fishnik Photography.

Obras de Nick Clegg

Associated Works

The Orange Book (2004) — Contribuinte — 41 cópias
Why Vote Liberal Democrat? (2010) — Prefácio — 3 cópias
Beyond Liberty: Is the Future of Liberalism Progressive? (2007) — Contribuinte — 2 cópias
This House : 2016 [theatre programme] (2016) — Contribuinte — 1 exemplar(es)


Conhecimento Comum

Data de nascimento
Member of Parliament
Budberg, Moura (great aunt)
Liberal Democrats




Published in 2016, just a year after the catastrophic defeat of the Lib Dems under the author’s leadership in the 2015 election, this is both an apologia and a call to consciousness. Clegg is clear about his mistakes, and in general accepts some share of the blame; though at time of writing, he still didn’t quite grasp how bad the debacle on tuition fees was in terms of betraying the trust of a lot of his own party’s core and new voters; he still didn’t realise how bad a mistake the AV referendum was in the first place, rather than going for proportional representation at local government elections in England and Wales which the Conservatives would likely have accepted; and while he accepted that the austerity narrative was fatal for his own re-election chances, he doesn’t appreciate the Lib Dems’ own role in that. Certainly what pushed me (temporarily) out of the party in 2013, despite having voted for Clegg as leader in 2007, was that Lib Dem ministers seemed to be exulting in the welfare “reforms” that purported to help the disadvantaged by giving them less money, and I could not take that. Come 2015 the Lib Dems needed a good and coherent narrative of what they had achieved in government, did not have it, and are still paying the price.

Those blind spots aside, the book is a very interesting reflection on UK politics as seen from the vantage point of the leader of the minority party in the UK’s first coalition government since 1945. I accept some of his points. First, a centre-left coalition in 2010 would not have worked. The numbers just were not there, and there would have been another election in six months which the Conservatives would have won with a large majority after the economy tanked. Second, of course the Lib Dems in government were never going to get everything they wanted. However, they made some bad strategic choices about what to get, and I think failed to respond to the tactical sneakiness of the Conservative establishment – especially Gove and Osborne. Third, it is the norm rather than the exception for junior coalition partners to lose seats, often a lot of seats, at the next election. (Though perhaps the Lib Dems could have prepared better for this both internally and with external messaging.)

The central message of the book is that the liberal centre of politics still matters, and is deserving of support, in an age of increasing populism. 2016 of course was the year of Brexit and Trump, and populism clearly remains very strong. Although I still count myself a liberal, it’s rather difficult to point to liberal successes since 2016. The Belgian prime minster right now is from the Flemish liberal party, who are currently polling at 8%, with the far-right Vlaams Belang in the lead with three times as much support. (And that’s just figures for Flanders, rather than Belgium as a whole.) The ruling Liberal Party in Canada is currently polling fourteen points behind the Conservatives. Whatever you may try to assert about being right in the long term, it looks like today’s voters are looking to the extremes.

One of the points of Clegg’s book that has dated most since 2016 is the assertion that Labour is unelectable. That was perfectly true under Jeremy Corbyn, whose flaws were manifest, but it’s obviously not true now, when the Tories are desperately claiming that an opinion poll result showing them less than twenty points behind is evidence that they can cling on. Keir Starmer will win next year’s election, and win big. The curious thing is that this is probably also good news for the Lib Dems, who have tended to do well when Labour does well. There is clearly a large-ish group of voters who normally vote for the Conservatives, will never vote Labour, but will vote for the Lib Dems, if they can be persuaded that they don’t need to fear a Labour government. If you plug the current poll numbers into Electoral Calculus, the Lib Dems make substantial gains just on a direct swing from Conservatives to Labour, and tactical voting is likely to magnify that. In the 1997 election, when Labour got a huge majority, the Lib Dems went from 18 to 46 seats, an increase of 156%. To equal that scale of gain next year, they’d need to go to 28 or 29 from the 11 of 2019 (now 15, thanks to by-election gains), and that seems very plausible. It won’t get them into government, but it puts them back in play for a future hung parliament.

Anyway, I read less about UK politics than I used to, but I am very glad I read this.
… (mais)
nwhyte | 1 outra resenha | Dec 17, 2023 |
This was interesting. It's not a warts and all account of what happened during the Coalition government - it's quite coy about that. It's more a meditation on the future of UK and Western politics and its swing to populism and whether liberalism can recover its strength.
It's also kinda of depressing on how broken the UK democratic system is and that surprise, surprise those in power will obstruct as much as they can to stop losing their own power structures. Proportional representation, House of Lords!
I think I'd have liked him to stick the knife into some of his coalition partners occasionally - the only one he really has a go at is Gove. But he comes across as a decent man and maybe that is why he does not.
… (mais)
infjsarah | 1 outra resenha | Jul 29, 2017 |
welshhilary | May 9, 2021 |


You May Also Like

Associated Authors


Also by
½ 3.7

Tabelas & Gráficos