|
Loading... Fermat's Last Theoremde Simon Singh
Recomendações do LibraryThingRecomendações dos membrosCarregando...
não gostará
provavelmente não gostará
provavelmente gostará
gostará
irá adorar Registre-se no LibraryThing tpara descobrir se gostará deste livro. Most people are familiar with the Pythagorean Theorem which describes a right triangle: a^2 b^2 = c^2. However, what you may not know is that Pierre Fermat claimed back in the 1600s to be able to prove that a^n b^n = c^n has no whole number solutions for n > 2. Trial and error suggests this to be true, but for over 350 years, no one could prove it. This is the story of the equation and those who worked towards the eventual solution in the early 1990s, from Pythagoras through Andrew Wiles, who published the final proof. His proof is complicated enough that I suspect Fermat's proof was flawed, but it makes for a surprisingly engrossing read all the same. There are tons of names and personal stories in this book, and though they often feel tangential, every single person discussed has great bearing in one way or another on the solving of Fermat's Last Theorem. One doesn't usually equate mathematics with drama or suspense, but both are present here. Definitely recommended for anyone with even a passing interest in math or history.Note: The UK version of this book, which I have, is titled Fermat's Last Theorem. The American version is called Fermat's Enigma. There is also another book called Fermat's Last Theorem which was written by Amir D. Aczel. Confusion abounds. ( )May 31, 2009. Yesterday I finished reading Fermat's Last Theorem. I plan to write a glowing book review but this space is too limited to contain it. 30 October 2001 Fermat's Enigma Simon Singh This is a journalistic account of the proof of Fermat's theorem, that states that there is no whole number solution for aN+bN =cN for N>2. The theorem was unproved for 350 years, after Pierre Fermat noted that he had a marvelous proof that the margin of the book he was writing in could not contain. Andrew Wiles of Princeton's math department finally proved it using very modern math, while proving something called the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture. I enjoyed reading the history of the theorem, and Singh is a very good story teller. I had no clue about the mathematics involved, and could not even look up some of the terms in my reference books. This was the book that really got me excited about popular science writing. A classic, beautifully done. sem resenhas | adicionar uma resenha
References to this work on external resources.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Descrição do livro |
|
(retirado da Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:57:51 -0400)
O primeiro ciclo de testes foi encerrado. Visite o grupo Open Shelves Classification para mais detalhes.
Quick Links |
| Ebooks | Audio | Trocar |
| — | — | 9/45 |